Is it Possible to Attain the Speed of Light by Combining Two Half-Speed Bodies?

waqarrashid33
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Every one know that the speed of light "c" is unattainable but IS half the speed of life is attainable?
i.e 1/2(c)
If we get two bodies of 1/2(c) speed then by moving these bodies in opposite direction the spees of light is attainable?
Is it possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A speed of 0.5c is attainable, but velocities don't add up like that in special relativity. Instead of w=u+v, the rule is

w=\frac{u+v}{1+\frac{uv}{c^2}}

With u=-0.5c and v=0.5c, you get w=c/(1+0.25)=0.8c.
 
I don't know about the details of relativity but know about it,s results.
Is from this equation the velocity of light is attainable or not by the motion of two bodies having speed less than C
 
It's not. If u<c and v<c, then w<c.
 
Since this is the Relativity section, think of the situation in terms of Special Relativity.
The 2nd postulate says that all observers measure the speed of light to be the same c.
So it doesn't matter to me how 'fast' any other object is traveling, I always measure c as c. I could accelerate for a long time, making me go a lot faster than other objects, doesn't change anything - we will each continue to measure c.
A consequence of this idea is that, as stated above, the (relative) speeds of individual moving objects does not add algebraically.
Ron
 
If we get two bodies of 1/2(c) speed then by moving these bodies in opposite direction the spees of light is attainable?
Is it possible?

yes. Fredriks answer is precisely correct as observed from either u or v,

but if these are the speeds of spaceships relative to earth, an observer will see the ships moving apart at speed c...but if each ship emitted light, the light from each would be observed at speed c among all observers...
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
53
Views
6K
Replies
42
Views
679
Replies
93
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top