Is it possible to evaluate x^(2/3) for x<0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nietzsche
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating the expression (-1)^(2/3) and the confusion surrounding its definition for negative values of x. While calculators often return "undefined" for such expressions, the manipulation shows that (-1)^(2/3) can equal 1 through different approaches, including using complex numbers. The conversation highlights that fractional powers of negative bases can lead to restrictions in calculators, which may adhere to conventions that limit outputs to nonnegative real numbers. It is noted that the fractional power identity holds under certain conditions, particularly when m and n are in lowest terms. Ultimately, the expression can be defined and graphed for all real numbers when m is even and n is odd.
nietzsche
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
I am very confused. Here I was thinking I know the basics of algebra, and then I get two questions in my homework today with exponents like this.

(-1)^{\frac{2}{3}} = undefined

when I type it into my calculator.

But with manipulation,

(-1)^{2/3} = [(-1)^{2}]^{\frac{1}{3}} = 1

Am I missing something here? My textbook solutions manual says that you can graph such a function for negative values, but when I plug it into, for example, my Mac's graphing software, it only graphs it for positive values of x.

Which one is correct?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I can't speak for the calculators. However the solution can be obtained using complex variables:
-1=e[pi]i.
We the have 3 possible answers for (-1)2/3:
e2(n+1)[pi]i/3, where n=0,1,2.
 
My TI-89 gives an answer of 1 no matter how I use the parenthesis.

(-1)2/3 = 1
((-1)1/3)2 = 1
((-1)2)1/3 = 1

Which should make sense since:
- It is possible to square a negative and then take the cube root of the resulting number.
- It is possible to find the cube root of a negative number and square the resulting number.
 
pbandjay said:
My TI-89 gives an answer of 1 no matter how I use the parenthesis.

(-1)2/3 = 1
((-1)1/3)2 = 1
((-1)2)1/3 = 1

Which should make sense since:
- It is possible to square a negative and then take the cube root of the resulting number.
- It is possible to find the cube root of a negative number and square the resulting number.

Thank you, I guess I should buy a new calculator.
 
(Details of previous comment)

3 solurions: 1, (-1+(-3)1/2)/2, (-1-(-3)1/2)/2
 
When I went to school it was considered conventional to consider, the square root of a square as its absolute value and hence positive. Of course, this is only a convention; but calculators may be constructed to honor this convention.
 
Last edited:
I believe what is happening is a restriction of the computing device. Power functions with fractional powers are frequently restricted to nonnegative real numbers (Maple for example).

But the fractional power identity

x^{m/n}=\sqrt[n]{x^m}={(\sqrt[n]{x})}^m

holds provided that the radicals on the right are defined.

However this assumes m and n are in lowest terms.

For example:

(-1)^{2/3}={(\sqrt[3]{-1})^2=(-1)^2=1

but

(-1)^{4/6}={(\sqrt[6]{-1})^4=\text{ undefined}

This may be part of why calculating devices shy away from fractional powers of negative bases.

The extension of roots to complex values is usually only done if the inputs are also complex. This subtely changes the meaning of some radicals.

\sqrt[3]{-8}=-2 in the real number sense.

\sqrt[3]{-8}=1+i\sqrt{3} in the complex number sense.

In general, provided m and n are in lowest terms and n is odd, the expression x^{m/n} is defined for all real numbers and can be graphed.

--Elucidus
 
Use x^y = e^(y.log(x)). If x=r.e^(i.t) then log(x)=log(r)+i.(t+2.pi.k) where k is any integer. This will give you all possible values of x^y.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top