Is it possible to impart a moment with soundwaves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skyler0114
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moment
AI Thread Summary
Adjusting sound wave properties to spin asymmetric objects in a medium of the same material presents challenges, particularly with spherical shapes. The discussion highlights the feasibility of using sound waves to induce motion in solids and powders, such as spinning a cube of aluminum within aluminum shavings. However, the torque generated by sound waves is limited, which restricts their application in creating sound-powered motors. The complexities of manipulating sound waves for this purpose suggest that while possible, practical implementation remains difficult. Overall, the potential of sound waves in this context is intriguing but currently underexplored.
Skyler0114
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Can one adjust the properties of a sound wave to use it to spin an arbitrary object of shape S in a medium comprised of the same material. My intuition tells me that it would be much more difficult (if not impossible) to do this with spherical objects, so for now we can assume the object is assymetric if that makes things easier.

Here is a possible example: Let's say for example we want to spin a cube of aluminum inside a big bundle of loosely (or tightly) packed aluminum shavings.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes sound waves can be used to spin a solid object or powders, sand etc. There is not much power produced in the way of torque so it has not been used to make sound powered motors etc

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top