Is it Possible to Measure Q or P Without Determining x1 and x2 or p1 and p2?

clacker
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Question about measuring observables. If have 2 particle system the particle seperation
Q=x1-x2 and total momentum P=p1+p2 are observables of the system as a whole and are
commuting. How do you measure these observables. It would seem the only way to
measure the separation is to measure the individual particle positions x1,x2 and subtract
them. With the total momentum you measure the particle momentum's seperately and add.
However, since Q,P commute you should be able to measure Q,P simultaneously. But if do
it by measuring individual particle properties you have violated uncertainty principle since
you have both position and momentum for each particle. So is there some way to measure
Q or P without determining x1 and x2 or p1 and p2 or are Q and P nonmeasurable and only really mathematical fictions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your P and Q belong to different, independent subsystems or quasi-particles. They are directly measurable. See Chapters 1 and 3 in http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.4416.
 
My question is not the measuring of P and Q together, but how do you measure just Q say. If you measure each particles position seperately then subtract I don't think you are actually in an eigenstate of Q but rather in 2 separate 1 particle eigenstates.
 
No, not even so because the variables x1 and x2 are correlated (not independent). The relative motion is a subsystem with its own properties - proper frequencies, angular momenta, energies, etc.
 
so you're saying that if I measure x1 and x2 that put's me into an eigenstate of Q.
What about the fact that Q and P commute. If I now measure P haven't I got
x1,x2,p1,p2 and now know each particles position and momentum with certainty thus
violating the uncertainty principle.
 
Hi.

clacker said:
My question is not the measuring of P and Q together, but how do you measure just Q say.

I considered it on such a case that x1 and x2 are not positions of the different particles but different directions say x and y of the same particle.

Let a particle be on the plane. Position detector of 100% sensitivity is placed on each point of the plane except on the line x - y = a. If no detector works when you make observation, you succeed to prepare eigenstate of Q of eigenvalue a.
It's the case of particle beam shoot on the screen with line slit. Momentum component along with the slit line, say px + py = P is not disturbed by the position measurement at the slit. So P and Q commute.

I hope it will make any sense.
Regards.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top