Is it possible to time travel according to Einstein's theory?

AI Thread Summary
Traveling at nearly the speed of light does result in time dilation, where time passes differently for the traveler compared to someone on Earth. If a rocket travels at approximately 99.5% the speed of light for one year, about ten years would pass on Earth. However, this phenomenon is not typically classified as "time travel" in the conventional sense. The discussion clarifies that traveling in a straight line at such speeds leads to this effect, but the implications of circular travel at similar speeds remain uncertain. Overall, the concept of time dilation is valid, but the terminology and understanding of "time travel" require careful consideration.
Razi Abid
Hello friends,
Einstein proved that if an object travels in a vacuum nearly at the speed of light, the result will be that the object will be transferred into future. One of my proffesors said that if a rocket travels round the Earth in space, with the speed of light for 1 year, then already a decade would have been passed on Earth. Is this TRUE, please justify.
with regards,
Razi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neither of those statemenst is true in the way "time travel" is normally understood.
The first is true in the sense that we are all "travelling" into the future (at the rate of one second per second!) all the time and that can be "accelerated". If you travels with a speed, relative to the earth, of approximately 99.5% the speed of light then you experience time changing at only one hour for 10 hours on the earth. After one year of travel, 10 years would have passed on earth. That is not exactly what I would call "time travel" or being "transferred into the future".

That is straight line motion. It is not at all clear (to me!) what would happen if you spent a year traveling in a circle at 99.5% the speed of light. Surely you professor did not actually say "at the speed of light"- that is impossible.
 
-----------

sorry, i remember that my proffesor said that if we travel nearly the speed of light. I just forgot to write the nearly in between.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Back
Top