Is it possible to use complex contour integrals to solve gaussian integrals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gaussian Integral
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the integral ∫exp((a+ib)x² + icx)dx from -∞ to ∞ using complex contour integrals. It is confirmed that the Gaussian integration formula can be applied for complex coefficients a, b, and c, provided the real part of a is positive. The method involves transforming the integral into a complex contour integral, specifically I = ∫ e^{-(a + ib)z²} dz along a specified path. The integrand is analytic, allowing for contour deformation, which simplifies the evaluation. Ultimately, the approach leads to the same result as the standard Gaussian integral method, confirming its validity.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I have an integral of the form (from -inf to inf):

∫exp((a+ib)x2+icx)dx

How do I solve that?

I have tried setting y = √(a+ib)(x+ic/√(a+ib))

And you then get an integral of exp(-y2) times a constant. But I don't even know if this is legal since part of the exponentials are complex. Is it possible to obtain the result with my method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried completing the square on the exponent?
 
what do you mean? Isn't that what I do by the introduction of my y?
 
Oh okay that didnt look clear to me as I expected you to leave it in the square form directly. I can't prove it off-hand, but the gaussian integration formula holds for complex a,b and c (where the exponent is in the form -ax^2 + bx + c) as long as the real part of a is positive
 
Fightfish said:
Oh okay that didnt look clear to me as I expected you to leave it in the square form directly. I can't prove it off-hand, but the gaussian integration formula holds for complex a,b and c (where the exponent is in the form -ax^2 + bx + c) as long as the real part of a is positive

What you want is not too hard to prove if you have a bit of complex function theory. If you take
I = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-(a + ib)(x + iy)^2} \, dx, \: a > 0
you can write it in the form of a complex contour integral:
I = \int_{\Gamma} e^{- (a + ib) z^2} \, dz,
where ##\Gamma## is the line from -∞ + iy to +∞ + iy. This is the limit as M → ∞ of I_M, the integral from -M + iy to +M + iy. Since the integrand is an analytic function of z, get the same result I_M if we deform the contour into a path from -M+iy to -M, then from -M to +M, then from M to M+iy. The part from -M to +M goes along the real axis, and the parts from -M+iy to -M and from M to M+iy go to zero as M → ∞, so we are left with
I = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-(a + ib) x^2} \, dx.
Now the usual method of squaring I and converting the double integral to polar coordinates applies essentially unchanged.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K