Is it possible to use complex contour integrals to solve gaussian integrals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gaussian Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of a complex integral of the form ∫exp((a+ib)x²+icx)dx, specifically exploring the use of complex contour integrals to solve Gaussian integrals. The subject area includes complex analysis and Gaussian integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the integral by introducing a substitution to simplify the expression. Some participants suggest completing the square on the exponent as a potential method. Others discuss the validity of applying Gaussian integration techniques to complex parameters, questioning the conditions under which these methods hold.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different methods and clarifying concepts related to complex integrals. Some guidance has been offered regarding the applicability of Gaussian integration formulas for complex parameters, and there is an exploration of contour integration techniques.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the real part of the parameter 'a' being positive for the Gaussian integration formula to hold. There are also mentions of the need for a foundational understanding of complex function theory to fully grasp the implications of the proposed methods.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I have an integral of the form (from -inf to inf):

∫exp((a+ib)x2+icx)dx

How do I solve that?

I have tried setting y = √(a+ib)(x+ic/√(a+ib))

And you then get an integral of exp(-y2) times a constant. But I don't even know if this is legal since part of the exponentials are complex. Is it possible to obtain the result with my method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried completing the square on the exponent?
 
what do you mean? Isn't that what I do by the introduction of my y?
 
Oh okay that didnt look clear to me as I expected you to leave it in the square form directly. I can't prove it off-hand, but the gaussian integration formula holds for complex a,b and c (where the exponent is in the form -ax^2 + bx + c) as long as the real part of a is positive
 
Fightfish said:
Oh okay that didnt look clear to me as I expected you to leave it in the square form directly. I can't prove it off-hand, but the gaussian integration formula holds for complex a,b and c (where the exponent is in the form -ax^2 + bx + c) as long as the real part of a is positive

What you want is not too hard to prove if you have a bit of complex function theory. If you take
I = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-(a + ib)(x + iy)^2} \, dx, \: a > 0
you can write it in the form of a complex contour integral:
I = \int_{\Gamma} e^{- (a + ib) z^2} \, dz,
where ##\Gamma## is the line from -∞ + iy to +∞ + iy. This is the limit as M → ∞ of I_M, the integral from -M + iy to +M + iy. Since the integrand is an analytic function of z, get the same result I_M if we deform the contour into a path from -M+iy to -M, then from -M to +M, then from M to M+iy. The part from -M to +M goes along the real axis, and the parts from -M+iy to -M and from M to M+iy go to zero as M → ∞, so we are left with
I = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-(a + ib) x^2} \, dx.
Now the usual method of squaring I and converting the double integral to polar coordinates applies essentially unchanged.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K