Is It Rational to Equate Possibility with Probability?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drakkith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discussion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the concept of possibility versus probability, with participants expressing frustration over the ambiguity of the term "possible." One viewpoint emphasizes that while anything can be deemed possible, very few scenarios are probable, as true impossibility cannot be definitively proven. This leads to debates about extreme examples, such as the likelihood of a meteor landing on someone’s head or the feasibility of teaching a snake to tap-dance. Participants engage in playful banter, exploring the limits of logic and the definitions of "working" in various contexts, such as a TV functioning without electricity. The conversation highlights the challenges of discussing hypothetical scenarios and the nuances of defining what is realistically achievable versus merely possible.
Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,175
Reaction score
7,625
Alright, am I the only one that hates discussing if something is "Possible"? In effect, you can say that anything is possible because you can never 100% prove that something is impossible. (I can't 100% gurantee that gravity won't turn off tomorrow, I just have no reason to believe it because we've never observed it happen and have no reason to think it will.)

To me, anything is "Possible", but very few things are "Probable". (Compared to what's Possible, since you can never say that something is 100% impossible)

I get into arguments with my roomate all the time and his argument always boils down to him saying "Well, anythings possible". It almost infuriates me. My view is that when someone tells me "Its POSSIBLE that a meteor will land on your head in 30 seconds", I like to reply with "Only if the meteor is already there heading for me."

Obviously my view is that if it's not there, it's not going to land on my head. We just don't know if it is there, hence the "It's possible" view.

Does anyone else feel this way or does anyone think I am being "close minded" or something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I still contend that it is impossible to teach a snake to tap-dance, but otherwise I agree with you.
 
Danger said:
I still contend that it is impossible to teach a snake to tap-dance, but otherwise I agree with you.

Doesn't seem impossible to me...tail coiled in one shoe, neck looped through the laces of another...add an electric volt and *clatter clatter*

doesn't sound very good...hum
 
Danger said:
I still contend that it is impossible to teach a snake to tap-dance, but otherwise I agree with you.

Ha, got to love the Danger replies. =)
 
G037H3 said:
Doesn't seem impossible to me...tail coiled in one shoe, neck looped through the laces of another...add an electric volt and *clatter clatter*

doesn't sound very good...hum

Damn! You found a flaw in my logic. I reluctantly concede defeat.
 
just agree and say its not very probable, he has no choice to agree with you
end of discussion
 
Well I'd say a human surviving without lungs and a brain (without outside help) is impossible.

My TV working without a source of electricity is impossible.
 
jarednjames said:
Well I'd say a human surviving without lungs and a brain (without outside help) is impossible.

My TV working without a source of electricity is impossible.

Not true, it could work as a paperweight without electricity.
 
lisab said:
Not true, it could work as a paperweight without electricity.

But that's not working in the way I meant it, nor in the manner for which it was designed. Nice try though.
 
Back
Top