Is it right to condition a RV on dependent RV?

  • Thread starter Thread starter devonho
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between two discrete random variables, X and B, where B is defined based on the value of X. It explores the implications of conditioning probabilities, specifically questioning the validity of expressing P[X|B] given that B is dependent on X. The consensus leans towards the idea that expressing P[X|B] may not be meaningful due to the recursive nature of the conditional probability. Participants also calculate specific probabilities related to B being 0 and the corresponding values of X. The conversation highlights the complexities of conditional probability in the context of dependent events.
devonho
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let there be two discrete random variables:

<br /> X \in \lbrace 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 \rbrace \quad \text{where } P[X] \text{ is uniformly distributed over the sample space of } X \text{.}<br />

<br /> B = \left\lbrace<br /> \begin{array}{cl}<br /> 1 &amp; \text{if} \quad X&gt;4 \\<br /> 0 &amp; \text{otherwise}\\<br /> \end{array}\right.<br />

<br /> P[B \mid X]=\left\lbrace<br /> \begin{array}{cl}<br /> 0 &amp; \text{if} \quad x \in \lbrace 1,2,3,4 \rbrace\\<br /> 1 &amp; \text{if} \quad x \in \lbrace 5,6,7,8,9,10 \rbrace\\<br /> \end{array}\right.<br />

<br /> P[X] = {1\over10} <br />

<br /> P[X,B] = P[B \mid X]P[X] = \left\lbrace<br /> \begin{array}{cl}<br /> 0 &amp;\text{if} \quad x \in \lbrace 1,2,3,4 \rbrace\\<br /> {1\over 10} &amp; \text{if} \quad x \in \lbrace 5,6,7,8,9,10 \rbrace\\<br /> \end{array}\right.<br />
The above should be agreeable. But what about:

<br /> P[X,B] = P[X \mid B]P<b><br /> </b>

Since B is dependent on X, is it meaningful or even correct to write an expression for P[X|B]?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I think no because the conditional probability will then be recursive.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's perfectly ok to discuss the probability of an underlying event given an observation concerning it.
P[B=0] = 0.4
P[X=1|B=0] = 1/4
P[X=1 & B=0] = 0.1
etc.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Back
Top