Is It Still the Same Object After Atomic Reconstruction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter enricfemi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the philosophical and scientific implications of a hypothetical machine capable of recording and reconstructing objects atom by atom. A key question arises: if an object is disassembled and then perfectly rebuilt, is it still the same object? This leads to comparisons with the Ship of Theseus, where the identity of an object is questioned based on changes to its components. The conversation also touches on the No Cloning Theorem, which suggests that perfect duplication may not be scientifically feasible. Participants explore the implications of perfect copies on our understanding of identity, suggesting that if duplication were possible, it could fundamentally alter perceptions of sameness. The analogy of a drop of water in the ocean illustrates the complexity of identity in a world where molecular configurations can change, yet the molecules themselves remain identical. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the ongoing philosophical debate about identity and existence in the context of advanced technology.
enricfemi
Messages
195
Reaction score
0
if one day we have a machine which can records every atoms' position and kind,and breake down the object into atoms,then rebuild the object use the record before.

is the object after such process still the same object before it?

if we have a clock,and we tear down it. is it still a clock? of course not. but if it is broken,and we just change one part of it, is it the same clock? if it is ,which part should we change ,then it's not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Scientifically, it is not clear that this well ever be possible. There is already one rigorous impossibility result in this area:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_cloning_theorem

Philosophically, the ability to make perfect copies would be a bedrock shift in our understanding of what it means for two things to be the same.

Right now it maybe silly to say:

"I know this is the same cup I used yesterday."

But in this future with perfect duplication this could be bonafide knowledge, since when pressed for evidence you could say:

"After all, I am sure it has never been recorded by a duplicate machine."

In other words, we will deal with this issue as it arises; it is a non-problem.
 
thanks,but i still confused.
to make this thing more clearly, i decided to use another example:
suppose a drop of water, i drop it to sea, is it still exist?
 
enricfemi said:
thanks,but i still confused.
to make this thing more clearly, i decided to use another example:
suppose a drop of water, i drop it to sea, is it still exist?

The water molecules and whatever else was in the water are still there, but there is a very small change you will ever be able to poor out that same configuration of water and other molecules out of the ocean ever before.
However, please consider that molecules are supposed to be identical, so that dramatically increases your chances, just that it needs to have the same number of each molecule.
 
enricfemi said:
if one day we have a machine which can records every atoms' position and kind,and breake down the object into atoms,then rebuild the object use the record before.

is the object after such process still the same object before it?
When the atmoic world is as finely-definable as the digital world, we will have that.

Question: is a copy of a file in your computer distinguishable from its original? The answer to this question will answer your real-world question.
 
Back
Top