Is it worth learning Calculus of Variations?

AI Thread Summary
Calculus of variations is a foundational concept in applied mathematics that extends beyond merely solving Euler-Lagrange equations. It serves as the origin of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, emphasizing principles like stationary states and least action. This field is crucial for addressing complex problems in physics and engineering, such as the brachistochrone problem and the area-perimeter problem. Understanding calculus of variations allows for the exploration of more general variables beyond just generalized positions and their derivatives. Engaging with this theory reveals its beauty and significance in various scientific applications.
torstum
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone,

I'm already familiar with, and have used Lagrangians and Euler-Lagrange equations. I'm interested in calculus of variations, but if it all boils down to solving euler-lagrange equations (and this is probably the part where I'm mistaken), then what's the point? Please tell me if there is more to it than that. I would appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Er.. you have have this thing reversed. The calculus of variation, as far as I can tell, is the ORIGIN of Lagrangian/Hamiltonian mechanics. It is where the whole concept of a 'stationary'/maximal state and least-action principle are applied and expanded to the Lagrangian/Hamiltonian mechanics.

So no, they are not the same thing, even though they can lead to the same thing. Least action principle, for example, can account for Fermat's Least time principle. Besides, this would give you an analogous concept to the Feynman's path integral later on.

Zz.
 
To my mind, the calculus of variations is one of the most beautiful chapters in applied mathematics. There are a lot of problems in physics and engineering whose single solution requires knowledge of calculus of variations.

Think about the famous brahistochrone problem or the famous area-perimeter problems.
 
torstum said:
Hi everyone,

I'm already familiar with, and have used Lagrangians and Euler-Lagrange equations. I'm interested in calculus of variations, but if it all boils down to solving euler-lagrange equations (and this is probably the part where I'm mistaken), then what's the point? Please tell me if there is more to it than that. I would appreciate it.

Calculus of variation is much more general than the EL equations. So it is worthwhile to understand it. The point is that th evariables with respect to which one varies the actions are not necessarily simply a generalized position and its derivative.

As one example, you could look up the derivation of Einstein's equations from a variational principle applied to the Einstein-Hilbert action. There one varies with respect to the metric so things look quite different than the usual EL equations.
 
Thanks for the feedback, it sure looks like a beautiful theory, and well worth getting into.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top