Is Kate Moss's View on Thinness Controversial? Share Your Opinion!

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanP
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Kate Moss's quote, "Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels," sparked significant controversy, with many questioning the implications of promoting extreme thinness. Some participants argue that maintaining a low body fat percentage can be healthy and desirable, while others emphasize the importance of accepting diverse body types and focusing on overall health rather than size. The discussion highlights the struggle between societal beauty standards and individual self-acceptance, with opinions varying on whether the sacrifices required for a supermodel physique are worthwhile. Additionally, the influence of celebrity messages on public perception, especially among young women, is a critical concern. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the complexity of body image and health in contemporary society.
  • #51
My wife and I have a slightly younger female friend who always looked her best just after she had delivered her kids, and went right back to real skinny soon after. Drinking shakes, eating unhealthy amounts of fried foods, etc never put any weight on her, so eventually, she went the route of getting decent weight-training on a high-protein diet, and ultimately resorted to breast implants to get some curves back. Slender, dark-haired with pale, freckled cheeks and lively eyes - she's the ideal that some women aspire to. She's no bimbo, either. She's the assistant director for the library of a pretty famous deceased GOP senator.

It troubled her that people told her how fantastic she looked a month or so after having given birth, then asked if her health was OK after she dropped back to her "normal" weight a couple of months later. She's a really sweet lady. Her family hired a photographer for her wedding and he did a good job, but the album that I made up of her getting prepared, having fun with her wedding party at the rehearsal, etc, and of the wedding itself has always been her favorite. How many brides do you know that TRIED to gain a few extra pounds to fill out that special gown?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
I tossed my first wedding pictures, I looked awful. My collar bones were sticking out and my dress just hung there. I weighed 92 pounds. I have no shape. No hips, no rear, no thighs. My first husband asked me once how I managed to keep my pants from falling off since there was nothing to hold them up. I was a shapeless cylinder. But now I'm more weeble shaped.
 
  • #53
Evo said:
I tossed my first wedding pictures, I looked awful. My collar bones were sticking out and my dress just hung there. I weighed 92 pounds. I have no shape. No hips, no rear, no thighs. My first husband asked me once how I managed to keep my pants from falling off since there was nothing to hold them up. I was a shapeless cylinder. But now I'm more weeble shaped.
Our friend had hips to provide some shape, but apart from that, she was/is slender to a degree that some of her friends and many in her family considered unhealthy, and they made an issue of it. She is fit as can be and as she ages, she actually has gotten a tiny belly (all below the hip-line) and with the enhanced breasts, she has what a lot of people might consider an "ideal" figure. When I was running open-mike jams at a local tavern, she'd often show up to enjoy the music and get away a bit from the family, and she'd be getting hit on by guys 20 years her junior. Think Kate Jackson, only a bit cuter, with freckles. Being considered too skinny can hurt, though I have to feel that being considered too fat can hurt a lot more. I have a younger sister that is heavy, and she has gotten resigned to it, but is bitter. Another sister is zaftig, and happy with herself, and the other is pretty slim and is unhappy as can be. My sisters all dwelled on self-image/peer-image way too much for their health.
 
  • #54
turbo-1 said:
Our friend had hips to provide some shape, but apart from that, she was/is slender to a degree that some of her friends and many in her family considered unhealthy, and they made an issue of it. She is fit as can be and as she ages, she actually has gotten a tiny belly (all below the hip-line) and with the enhanced breasts, she has what a lot of people might consider an "ideal" figure.

Obviously her looks keeps her happy, and this is the important thing. I don't believe her family has any say in this, and unless they are all MDs they shouldn't go on the "unhealthy" bandwagon.

A good friend of mine, a 40 year old man has 58kg at 1.80m. Imagine that twig with a caveman style haircut, and a full beard. ~10 years ago at his wedding, one of his wife's niece was actually quite disturbed when she seen him for the first time, started to cry and told her mother that she seen Jesus :P
 
  • #55
DanP said:
A good friend of mine, a 40 year old man has 58kg at 1.80m. Imagine that twig with a caveman style haircut, and a full beard. ~10 years ago at his wedding, one of his wife's niece was actually quite disturbed when she seen him for the first time, started to cry and told her mother that she seen Jesus :P
Ahaha, that's funny.
 
  • #56
DanP said:
Obviously her looks keeps her happy, and this is the important thing. I don't believe her family has any say in this, and unless they are all MDs they shouldn't go on the "unhealthy" bandwagon.
In this instance, I think that she was working to keep from feeling unhappy, not just to make herself feel happy. It's a distinction that I feel is important. She is slim, slender, etc, but not gaunt, yet people who had known her for most of her life were commenting on how slight she was. She is married to a close friend of mine and it matters to me whether they are happy. She is in a relatively public position, and when friends and family make comments about her appearance, it can carry over to her work. If I posted scanned images of some of her wedding pictures (or later) most of you would be saying "what a beauty". My wife and I keep a picture of ourselves and her, and her husband's brother, taken when she came back to us from a visit from WA state. It is prominently displayed in our kitchen - we formed a goofy conga-line and posed for my film-camera which was on a tripod on a self timer.
 
  • #57
DanP said:
Your take ?

Moss quote
******************************************************************
WWD: Do you have a motto?
KM: There are loads. There’s “Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels.” That’s one of them. You try and remember, but it never works.

well, first of all, she's admitting that it's not really true ("it never works"), but it's a lie she tells herself to reach her goal. second, in some ways, she's like a pro athlete. to be successful, she has to train her body to meet a certain goal. this is a goal that, apparently, a majority of the public supports with their hard-earned dinero, otherwise, there would be obese (or at least chubby) supermodels.

is it irresponsible of her? no, i don't think so. what if you amended her statement to read "Nothing tastes as good as not being obese feels." ? it would then say that not being obese may require a lot of pain and sacrifice, but that it is a worthwhile goal. but no one wants to hear that. no one wants to hear "You're fat and it's your own damn fault. You should eat less and exercise more. Yes, it's work, but work isn't supposed to be fun, because then it wouldn't be called work." no, i don't think that would go over well at all. it would even be called irresponsible.
 
  • #58
Evo said:
I tossed my first wedding pictures, I looked awful. My collar bones were sticking out and my dress just hung there. I weighed 92 pounds. I have no shape. No hips, no rear, no thighs. My first husband asked me once how I managed to keep my pants from falling off since there was nothing to hold them up. I was a shapeless cylinder. But now I'm more weeble shaped.

weebles wobble, but their pants stay up.
 
  • #59
The issue of weight and health is a complex one, especially for women. The US certainly has a problem with obesity and unhealthy overconsumption. However, many girls who do not have weight problems develop severe psychological problems from a negative body image.
It is very difficult to bring people out of dichotomus thinking, especially when it is so closely tied to ego.

To answer the original poster: If the statement is rephrased as "The millions of dollars I receive from keeping myself extremely skinny is worth abstaining from ice cream," then she is right.

Applying the idea more generally, the balance between health and "indulgence" is something different people draw the line at for themselves. I don't think you can really make a general statement that is going to apply to everyone other then "moderation in habits is usually a good idea."
 
  • #60
turbo-1 said:
rom feeling unhappy, not just to make herself feel happy. It's a distinction that I feel is important. She is slim, slender, etc, but not gaunt, yet people who had known her for most of her life were commenting on how slight she was. She is married to a close friend of mine and it matters to me whether they are happy. She is in a relatively public position, and when friends and family make comments about her appearance, it can carry over to her work. If I posted scanned images of some of her wedding pictures (or later) most of you would be saying "what a beauty". My wife and I keep a picture of ourselves and her, and her husband's brother, taken when she came back to us from a visit from WA state. It is prominently displayed in our kitchen - we formed a goofy conga-line and posed for my film-camera which was on a tripod on a self timer.

turbo,

Im not sure I follow. Why is this distinction important ? Aint the two statements largely equivalent?

About the fact that her family or friends comments impacting her job. Wouldn't be much more reasonable for friends and family to shut-up and don't try to change her into something she doesn't want to be , then her giving to the heat and make herself miserable just to keep happy some ppl which should look after their own business in the first place? Meaning, they should be more concerned with their looks then hers :P

I don't know about others, but I myself would have given the finger long ago to the well meaning but annoying crowd which tries to tell me what I should do with my body. At least I do hope that your friend is 100% behind her in this.
 
  • #61
Evo said:
I tossed my first wedding pictures, I looked awful. My collar bones were sticking out and my dress just hung there. I weighed 92 pounds. I have no shape. No hips, no rear, no thighs.

Well, Evo, you did scored the millionaire high lord. It must have been something special about you...
 
  • #62
Monique said:
I'd like to see a study that would support that point. I think skinny girls can have just as much self esteem issues as chubby girls. I know I was always picked on the fact that I was skinny, even on this board people make derogatory comments towards skinny people.

Id like to see a study as well.

My observations where purely empirical, based on what I say daily in the gyms and
during social encounters.

It may very well be statistical in nature. I mean, there are more adult women out there which have issues being overweight rather than a underweight. And the trend is increasing, more and more ppl eat and drink themselves fat. When normalized, it is quite possible the numbers of ppl with issue to be quite close.

While I believe there exist no excuse for a man to be frail and weak, I do find "skinny" girls and athletic types quite attractive. There is no chance in hell Ill go out with an overweight women. If that makes me shallow, that's it, I can live with it. I really do wonder if for every "me" really exists a man who is into "chubby" girls.
 
  • #63
Evo said:
Perhaps it was bad, we actually called her the "razor boned gazelle", and never meant it in a bad way and she never took it in a bad way. I still call her that today and she knows I mean it lovingly, that's what she is. She actually liked the nickname. We were always concerned that she wasn't eating enough to be healthy, but we never tried to make her eat more. I always had served vegetables and she loved my vegetables, also lentils, she ate a healthy assortnment of foods, but never very much.

lisab said:
Regarding nicknames...when she was very young I called her "head on a stick" (since most kids have disproportionately large heads). After puberty, I called her "hips and boobs on a stick".

Did this affect her? Well at age 16, she told me she was very happy with how she looks. Now, how many 16-year-old girls feel so good about themselves? I think it's all about intent. Sure I would tease her a bit, but I also told her she is very beautiful. (But more often, I reminded her how smart she is :smile:.)
If you call your kid/ spouse a fat seal, but you really mean it in a loving way, that would not make sense right? Being compared to a stick is not a compliment, not in my book anyway. Growing up they'd call me 'stick along the waterside' or a guy used to say that 'he was going to put me on his pickup' (it took me a long time to realize he was comparing me to a needle). Constant negative feedback is not good. While some people may start eating more when they're down, my appetite would actually be reduced in such a situation.

Just recently we had a student in the lab and she would constantly be harassed by her (low) weight, with the most ridiculous comments. The people making the snide remarks pretend it is all in good fun, but you shouldn't dare to say anything about their fat distribution.

The Ally McBeal show made me realize that you can be thin and accepted/successful, so that had a big influence on how I could view myself. That would probably seem weird to a lot of people.
 
  • #64
Monique said:
. The people making the snide remarks pretend it is all in good fun, but you shouldn't dare to say anything about their fat distribution.

Aesop's "The Fox and the Grapes". It seems to me that for many fat individuals a "skinny" women is a personal insult. Going like "If I can't be like her, at least I can pretend I don't care and bash her."
 
  • #65
Monique said:
Just recently we had a student in the lab and she would constantly be harassed by her (low) weight, with the most ridiculous comments. The people making the snide remarks pretend it is all in good fun, but you shouldn't dare to say anything about their fat distribution.

mostly women? that would be envy. many women can't stand to have a more desirable female in their midst. they'll do anything they can to bring her down a notch. if she's lean, they'll want her fat. if she has long hair, they'll want her to cut it. if she's respectable, they'll want her to have a bad reputation.
 
  • #66
Proton Soup said:
mostly women? that would be envy. many women can't stand to have a more desirable female in their midst. they'll do anything they can to bring her down a notch. if she's lean, they'll want her fat. if she has long hair, they'll want her to cut it. if she's respectable, they'll want her to have a bad reputation.
Also men, which a young student would look up to, will say in front of a crowd "you should eat more, you look like a walking stick" and laugh about it. It is a demeaning thing to say, no matter how much truth there may be in it. I was tempted to say "you should eat less, your stomach is hanging over your belt", but I'm not going to strike that low :rolleyes:
 
  • #67
Monique said:
"you should eat less, your stomach is hanging over your belt", but I'm not going to strike that low :rolleyes:

Is not such a low blow ...Cmmon, do it for the fun of it :devil:
 
  • #68
I identify. I was a distance-runner and competitive skier all through HS. My peak weight though HS was never much more than 120#, and I never hit 130# until I was in college. At 5'7", I was muscular, but pretty lean. I had a lot of friends in college that were wrestlers and football players, and the guys that wanted to recruit me were mostly the wrestlers. Lean muscle means a lot to them. I was far more interested in keeping the health of all of my fingers, hands, etc, because I could make quite a bit of money playing music on friday and saturday nights. That (along with dealing in instruments) was a major piece of cash-flow keeping me in school.
 
  • #69
Monique said:
Also men, which a young student would look up to, will say in front of a crowd "you should eat more, you look like a walking stick" and laugh about it. It is a demeaning thing to say, no matter how much truth there may be in it. I was tempted to say "you should eat less, your stomach is hanging over your belt", but I'm not going to strike that low :rolleyes:

It seems that no matter what your weight is, someone will criticize it. It's interesting that people feel so free to criticize weight when they wouldn't be so rude about other aspects of a person's appearance.

I was remarking to my boyfriend recently that I needed to buy new clothes again because I keep gaining weight in my new job (a combination of passing 35 and not spending my days at the farm, but still being on my feet a lot so I'm too tired to even think about things like working out when I get home, plus having the rest of my time to sit at a desk and eat snacks has not been good for my weight). He commented that he's not complaining, because he's been trying to get me to gain weight since we first met, when he thought I was too skeletal. (Obviously not enough to deter him from dating me...but I was a little 114 lb waif of a grad student then.) I liked it when I was that weight, though, because any clothes I bought looked good on me...they were all designed for that size. He complained that my hip bones stuck out too much and hurt him. :rolleyes: o:)

Since I've been teaching anatomy, that's actually not the only time I've heard that from men! As we teach them all the parts of the hip bones, I've heard others comment, "Oh, that's the part that hurts when..." and then they just cut their sentence short realizing what they were about to say to their professor. So, apparently men have some big preference for padding in that area. :biggrin:

But, I don't think it matters what size you are...someone will think they can be rude and criticize it.

Though, we have one of our office staff who I'm JEALOUS of! She had a baby last year. She is tall, and thin, and when she was only a week away from having the baby, she still looked teeny tiny, like she was just starting to show (in fact, that was when I first even noticed she was pregnant, when she was preparing for maternity leave!) Now that she has the baby, she's even thinner than before she got pregnant. She does look like a model, and she doesn't have to work at it at all (breast feeding probably helps, but based on her figure before hand, I don't think that's all it is). She eats plenty, but just has the sort of genetics that keep her thin.

Anyway, she looks perfect, but I'm sure she has someone who tells her "Eat! Eat! You're all skin and bones!" But then if you gain weight, they tell you you need to be on a diet. :rolleyes:

I think the bottom line is to just be happy with yourself and learn to ignore rude people.
 
  • #70
Monique said:
Also men, which a young student would look up to, will say in front of a crowd "you should eat more, you look like a walking stick" and laugh about it. It is a demeaning thing to say, no matter how much truth there may be in it. I was tempted to say "you should eat less, your stomach is hanging over your belt", but I'm not going to strike that low :rolleyes:

An important point about comments to my daughter, about how skinny she is: intent. Cuddling and kissing a child, while saying she looks like a cute little head on a stick, has no ill intent, IMO. Yet any comment about how someone looks, followed by laughter, is very cruel. I could never do that to anyone, least of all my own daughter.

But comments about my daughter's looks were few and far between. The vast majority of comments she heard while growing up were about on how smart she is, and how kind-hearted she is...positive reinforcement :smile:.
 
Last edited:
  • #71
Moonbear said:
She eats plenty, but just has the sort of genetics that keep her thin.

Interesting enough , if one has a resting metabolic rate only with 50kcal higher than another person, and if you assume that in a kilogram of bodyfat there are about 7700 kcal , in the course of a year you have: 50x365 = 18250 supplementary more kcal / year used. It amounts to 2.37 Kg of bodyfat.

While it doesn't seem a big number, it is a lot.

It this also brings me to another issue. How finely tuned must be regulation of appetite in a human to maintain weight. Just several kcal / day make a big impact on the course of a year. Say an excess of just 3g of fats (9kcal / g ) / day is 27kcal , over the course of a year 9855 kcal.

I find it extremely hard to imagine anyone can regulate appetite to account for 3g of fat in a meal. Perhaps regulation of body mass include "delayed" mechanisms which work over larger time spans, and which compensate for such minute quantities being ingested. Perhaps by modulating RMR. But then again, what constitutes the reference to which the whole system is reported ?

Its fascinating. More than that, human body is elegant.
 
  • #72
DanP said:
Is not such a low blow ...Cmmon, do it for the fun of it :devil:

yeah, it's not much going to bug most guys, tho
 
  • #73
DanP said:
I find it extremely hard to imagine anyone can regulate appetite to account for 3g of fat in a meal.
We can't. Which is why, as a people, we're gaining weight.


It worked quite well when our food source was limited and our means to get it was labour-intensive. Simpy eat as much as you can. If you ate enough, you lived. If you didn't get enough, you might be weaker, expend less enrgy, sleep longer etc. or in extreme cases, died.
 
  • #74
So, there can be a genetic component that comes from any of a large variety of hormones and signalling molecules. Alternatively, just as diabetes has an acquired form, so may obesity. So, just as you can permanently screw up your insulin receptors by being obese for a long time or since an early age, it is possible you can screw up your leptin receptors (leptin insensitivity) or any other of these receptors, if you start out overweight from an early age, and may get to the point where it does not matter how much you want to lose weight, you've already broken that regulatory system. This is of rising concern with the increase in childhood obesity. Children really don't know better, so if their parents allow them to be obese and don't help them regulate their diet when young, they really may be set up for life-long problems that will not be reversible once older.
I think that's what happens; parents make their kids overweight, therefore dooming them to be overweight for life.
If you see an entire family who is overweight, I doubt they all eat carrots all day and can't seem to lose weight.
Just because you have the feeling you need to eat more, why does it have to be cake? I eat a lot, but I'm careful what I eat, therefore I'm not fat.
Not all persons who are overweight present genetic defects in the regulation mechanisms. A lot of persons who get fat can thank this to a lifestyle where the need to do physical work (and hence oxidize nutrients ) is very low, and food is discretionary available.

However , it should be noted that staying long times overweight can induce acquired defects in metabolic regulation. Some of those can be reversible, some irreversible and you have to deal with them for the rest of your life.
My original point was directed at people who claim they CAN'T lose weight or they CAN'T gain weight. That just means they're not doing it right.
It isn't.

It also isn't a valid comparison to my quotes of your words and is thus irrelevant.

"I don't think there's such thing as naturally or unnaturally skinny or chubby."

This statement alone is a contradiction. How can something be neither natural nor unnatural?
You know what I meant. I think you're just nitpicking.
We're all the 'ectomorph' type
People talk about the body types like they're set in stone. You're ectomorph, but when you gain weight, you're another type of morph. Well, what's the point of giving it a technical name if it can change? Just say you're all skinny.
and have always wanted to gain weight. I tried the pizza, BLT burger, french fries diet; the chocolate ice cream diet; the protein-shakes diet.
I have a friend who says the same thing, but he eats so little of it, it's no wonder he can't gain weight. He has a small stomach, so it doesn't stretch very far. His idea of eating a lot is the same as me just getting started. He may eat his idea of a bunch of pizza, which is 3 slices, when I eat an entire large pizza by myself.
I never dared to join the gym, because you only work out when you want to loose weight.
Depends on the exercise. If you do cardio, you'll probably lose weight, but if you lift weights, you'll not only gain weight in muscle, you'll start eating more often.
Anyway, I've always found it very annoying that people think they can dictate how you should look.
You should look how you want to look. It's nobody elses business how you look. They should be worrying about themselves.
It is an image that is created in society: you go to aerobics to loose weight and the gym to become a buff muscle-beast and loose weight (fat). When I figured out that resistance training might be a good option I contacted a gym and asked what training program would be good, but hit a closed door.

I did join a gym for some time and combined the exercise with protein shakes. Now I joined a program that has a more personal approach and strengthens muscles in the extended position. It is called Essentrics and I'm very happy with it. I probably should join my boyfriend to the gym tomorrow, I wouldn't mind a body like Shakira
Do squats. Squats give women really nice butts and thighs. Most people see that as a man's exercise, but it's not.
You wouldn't say to a chubby person that hugging them feels like hugging fatty-blubber?
Of course not, who wants to hug a fat person in the first place?

Just kidding.
 
  • #75
DaveC426913 said:
Simpy eat as much as you can. If you ate enough, you lived. If you didn't get enough, you might be weaker, expend less enrgy, sleep longer etc. or in extreme cases, died.

Indeed. It worked back then, but this kills "us" in western society today. Activity levels due to work dropped significantly in the last 150 years. I seen studies estimating that average man and women back then expended 3500 Kcal / day. Food was scarcer than today.

Where are we today in western society ? An overabundance of food and abysmal activity levels, for both adults and kids. Some don't even allow their children to play rougher games because they are afraid they'll get "hurt". Some will keep them "safe in house" during winter and bad weather because poor child will get "ill" if exposed to elements. And to top this, they'll say "eat everything from your plate, else you won't grow", forcing the kid to overfeed. We get fatter, the average V02 Max for populations drops continuously, strength levels in most adults are very low... Metabolic regulation spins out of control even from childhood.

Giving this bleak image, Id say KM is right, her motto should be adopted by a lot of persons.
And in this thread I believe Lisa put it in best words so far.
 
Last edited:
  • #76
DanP said:
Giving this bleak image, Id say KM is right, her motto should be adopted by a lot of persons.
You know that Moss has a cocaine habit, right? Between cigarettes, coffee, booze, and coke, she's not the right person to be giving out life-style or health advice.

Have you heard the term "heroin chic" applied to severely underweight fashion models? There's a reason for that.
 
  • #77
leroyjenkens said:
My original point was directed at people who claim they CAN'T lose weight or they CAN'T gain weight. That just means they're not doing it right.

.

Of course everybody can lose or gain weight. But this doesn't mean everybody is born with the same "body". Because it is not so. We are not created equal. Expression (or lack thereof) of certain genes or a slightly different regulation can drastically change the landscape.

A slightly higher RMR, higher concentration of certain hormones, higher concentration of several key enzymes and you can end with quite different body compositions.

That does not mean that one of those persons had a inborn defect in gene regulation.
They are both in normal range of function. Yet one needs less effort to maintain a certain body composition than the other one. Or for that matter, to achieve certain results in sport competition. Our physiology is the same. Yet there we are not the same.
 
Last edited:
  • #78
turbo-1 said:
You know that Moss has a cocaine habit, right? Between cigarettes, coffee, booze, and coke, she's not the right person to be giving out life-style or health advice.

Have you heard the term "heroin chic" applied to severely underweight fashion models? There's a reason for that.

I know, but I don't really care. It is not for me to judge her.
 
  • #79
Turbo it wasn't meant to be health advice though was it. It wasn't an interview for a healthy eating magazine, it was an interview for a fashion column.
 
  • #80
DanP said:
I know, but I don't really care. It is not for me to judge her.
But it is crucial to answering the OP question.
 
  • #81
DaveC426913 said:
But it is crucial to answering the OP question.

Why?

She wasn't being asked to give advice on health. she was asked if she had any mottos that she lived by. Her other habits are irrelevent.

The OP just asked for comments on this.
 
  • #82
turbo-1 said:
Have you heard the term "heroin chic" applied to severely underweight fashion models? There's a reason for that.

Besides, if you use the commonly accepted dimensions of Kate Moss and you do the calculations, you see that her BMI is ~16.8 - 16.9. This category is at the lowish end of underweight , not severely underweight, which, if i recall correctly, starts at 16.5.

Btw, judging from the data you posted on board, it seems that before college you only had 7kg on KM. Only with 0.3 above start of underweight category which starts at 18.5.

Now should we start inventing names for the opposite category above normal BMI, the overweight ? How about we start calling the category 25 - 30 BMI "lard chic" ?

It would be mighty cool, don't you think so ?
 
Last edited:
  • #83
xxChrisxx said:
Why?

She wasn't being asked to give advice on health. she was asked if she had any mottos that she lived by. Her other habits are irrelevent.

The OP just asked for comments on this.
Her drug habit is inextricably linked to her weight.
Her weight is inextricably linked to her career and celebrity.
Her career and celebrity are inextricably tied to her status as a role model.

And like it or not, she is a role model.

So, what she is saying is tantmount to "getting superthin is an excellent path to supermodeldom and fame".
And how does Kate get superthin? With a drug addiction (and maybe eating less).
 
  • #84
DanP said:
Now should we start inventing names for the opposite category above normal BMI, the overweight ? How about we start calling the category 25 - 30 BMI "lard chic" ?
We do.

Overweight.
Obese.
Morbidly obese.
 
  • #85
DaveC426913 said:
So, what she is saying is tantmount to "getting superthin is an excellent path to supermodeldom and fame".
And how does Kate get superthin? With a drug addiction (and maybe eating less).

Only really truly stupid people and those who are doing it on puropse, who are unable to read into comment to find out what they acutally mean think she was saying.
"Anorexia... it's marvellous"It was a comment on self control over what you eat.
"Should I eat the meat pie... or the salad?"
Meat pies taste better, but make you fat.

Fact is we should have self control over what we eat. The fact that she doesn't practise what she preaches with regards to cocaine, alcohol etc, makes precisely no odds what so ever.

Also read the next thing she said. "you try to remember but it doesn't always work"
It was a stupid thing for her to say, as it was obvious the media were going to go ape**** about it.
 
  • #86
DaveC426913 said:
We do.

Overweight.
Obese.
Morbidly obese.

We don't. 25 -29.9 is referred with the politically correct term "overweight". How about calling those models politically correct as well, "underweight" not "heroin chic" ? Do we also go to our female coworkers or acquaintances over 25 - 29.9 category and call them "lard chic" ?
 
  • #87
DanP said:
We don't. 25 -29.9 is referred with the politically correct term "overweight". How about calling those models politically correct as well, "underweight" not "heroin chic" ? Do we also go to our female coworkers or acquaintances over 25 - 29.9 category and call them "lard chic" ?

You do realize that there's a big distinction here between the correct clinical terms and the popular slurs...

Severely underweight
Underweight
Ideal
Overweight
Obese
Morbidly obese

as opposed to

Heroin chic
Normal
Fat
Lard-butt

So I'm not sure what your problem is.
 
  • #88
DaveC426913 said:
Her drug habit is inextricably linked to her weight.

I have a friend who is also in the "underweight" category. I can ensure you she is not doing drugs. Also a male friend. Underweight also. He is not doing drugs.

You just can't generalize anything in this.
 
  • #89
xxChrisxx said:
Only really truly stupid people and those who are doing it on puropse, who are unable to read into comment to find out what they acutally mean think she was saying.
"Anorexia... it's marvellous"

It is fact that young, impressionable girls are taking after these underweight supermodels. And indeed some are anorexic.

Call them stupid if you want; that changes nothing.
 
  • #90
DanP said:
I have a friend who is also in the "underweight" category. I can ensure you she is not doing drugs. Also a male friend. Underweight also. He is not doing drugs.

You just can't generalize anything in this.
I didn't.

Note the pronoun: her.

How can you possibly misread that?
 
  • #91
You said her weight is directly affected by her using drugs. You have precisely no way of backing that statement up, its your opinion not fact.

Her drug habit is inextricably linked to her weight.

Prove it.

It's infact far more likey that she's skinny because she doen't eat enough to put on weight. A sniff of the party powder doesn't make you not eat (in majority of cases, there are those who get hyper and chose not to/forget to eat). It also doesn't make you magically lose weight either.

For you to make that statemnt, you are assuming she is an addict. A user != addict, even a habitual user. You've got to remember the company she was keeping at the time of the cocaine Kate stuff. You are also assuming she is one of the people that cocaine stops appetite. Anyway nicotine is a better hunger supressant than cocaine is. You are also assuming she is still a user.

Note, she's still skinny.
 
Last edited:
  • #92
DaveC426913 said:
You do realize that there's a big distinction here between the correct clinical terms and the popular slurs...

Severely underweight
Underweight
Ideal
Overweight
Obese
Morbidly obese

as opposed to

Heroin chic
Normal
Fat
Lard-butt

So I'm not sure what your problem is.

No problem at all, but when I said we should call 25 - 29.9 BMI "lard chic", you responded that we do ... and started to enumerate the correct clinical terms. Interesting choice, I was expecting a derogatory slang as well.
 
  • #93
lisab said:
But comments about my daughter's looks were few and far between. The vast majority of comments she heard while growing up were about on how smart she is, and how kind-hearted she is...positive reinforcement :smile:.
That's good :biggrin:

leroyjenkens said:
My original point was directed at people who claim they CAN'T lose weight or they CAN'T gain weight. That just means they're not doing it right.
Of course, everything is possible. If you eat more or less that should make a difference, but the amount of effort is not proportional to what is achieved. The only time I noticed I gained some weight is when I was eating 3 warm meals a day: Indian curry in the morning, BLT burger/pizza/fries during lunch and a regular warm meal during diner. Of course the weight didn't stay on for very long. I guess I'll set up an appointment with a nutritionist some day, I've always wondered what an expert would have to say :smile:

People talk about the body types like they're set in stone. You're ectomorph, but when you gain weight, you're another type of morph. Well, what's the point of giving it a technical name if it can change? Just say you're all skinny.
I can't help but think that people are not created equally, a clear example is how fat is stored: the locations can be very different from person to person. Funny thing is that I have a younger sister that I grew up with and she does have "meat on the bones", there was a big difference between her and my build even at a young age. Did my parents feed her more? My knowledge on anatomy is not extensive, so I don't know how much variety there is in basic anatomy from person to person. What determines the main variety in the size of a wrist, is it the bone, the muscles or the fat underneath the skin?

Do squats. Squats give women really nice butts and thighs. Most people see that as a man's exercise, but it's not.
Actually I have a home-trainer to train those muscles. Of course my older sister and I over the years managed to gain a few pounds, J-lo is my role model in that regard :smile:
 
  • #94
xxChrisxx said:
You said her weight is directly affected by her using drugs. You have precisely no way of backing that statement up, its your opinion not fact.



Prove it.

It's infact far more likey that she's skinny because she doen't eat enough to put on weight. A sniff of the party powder doesn't make you not eat (in majority of cases, there are those who get hyper and chose not to eat). It also doesn't make you magically lose weight either.

I'll leave it to the experts to hash out how much of her weight is actually attributable to her past drug addictions.

But we are talking about her role model status. It doesn't really matter how true it is, she is still sending the message to impressionable wannabes.
 
  • #95
Dave don't just dismiss it. You made a statement that her low weight is almost solely down to drug use (as that was the only factor you explicity outlined) and you just can't back that up. She is still skinny, but no longer uses... so you have a problem with you statement right there.

Yes she is a role model, and it was stupid for her to say it. Becuase it was obvious that people were going to read into it, that is was pro anorexic. However reading EXACTLY what she said, It's a comment about self control and not anorexia.

So say what you will. The SENTIMENT behind the statement was correct.I can't tell if you were on of the people who read it as pro anorexic, or are just taking a contrary view to play devils advocate.
 
Last edited:
  • #96
Monique said:
Actually I have a home-trainer to train those muscles. Of course my older sister and I over the years managed to gain a few pounds, J-lo is my role model in that regard :smile:

Actually, he is right here, there are not many things in this world which help shape a women's *** like *deep back squats* do. No home training toy will ever come close. On the other hand is a pretty technical exercise and the cause of a lot of injuries in strength training, so any adult should be properly instructed before attempting to squat. Children still have the ability to squat deep naturally and beautifully, but most western adults seems they lost this capacity. Thanks to a sedentary life :P
 
  • #97
xxChrisxx said:
Yes she is a role model, and it was stupid for her to say it. Becuase it was obvious that people were going to read into it, that is was pro anorexic.

However reading EXACTLY what she said, It's a comment about self control and not anorexia.

The important part is, unfortunately, not reading exactly what she said, but the idea that was put across by the snippet of her interview: after all, this is what the youngsters who idolise her are going to do. Of course, it's also the fault of the media for representing her comments in this slightly biased way, but ultimately, it is totally irresponsible for her to be using a pro-anorexia motto in any interview.
 
  • #98
xxChrisxx said:
You made a statement that her low weight is almost solely down to drug use (as that was the only factor you explicity outlined)
I did not say that at all. I said they are inextricably linked.

xxChrisxx said:
and you just can't back that up. She is still skinny, but no longer uses... so you have a problem with you statement right there.

It doesn't matter if it's fact. The idea of rolemodeldom is that one you idolize is giving you advice on things you don't know yourself. That's why you model yourself after them. Since it is impossible to go out and seek first-hand data on everything you want, you trust those you respect.
 
  • #99
cristo said:
. Of course, it's also the fault of the media for representing her comments in this slightly biased way, but ultimately, it is totally irresponsible for her to be using a pro-anorexia motto in any interview.

I would say "using a motto which can be interpreted as pro-anorexia", for I agree with Chris's interpretation.
 
  • #100
DaveC426913 said:
It doesn't matter if it's fact. It is the message she is sending.

What is the message ? That ppl should eat less ? Look around on the streets, armies of fat slobs, both man and women, should stop eating the mountains of food they ingest.
 
Back
Top