MHB Is Light a Particle? Examining the Double-Slit Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Particle
AI Thread Summary
Light must be considered a particle in specific circumstances, notably during the photoelectric effect, where light's particle-like properties are evident. The double-slit experiment highlights the paradox of light behaving both as a wave and a particle, challenging traditional scientific understanding. This experiment remains a focal point in discussions about the nature of light, as it demonstrates the complexities of quantum mechanics. Despite extensive study, a universally accepted explanation for the double-slit phenomenon is still elusive. The ongoing exploration of these concepts is essential for advancing scientific knowledge.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Are there any circumstances in which light must be considered a particle?

If so, when?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think the double-slit experiment ...

Double-slit experiment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

... is the most shocking paradox of science of all time. So far no one has been able to give a convincing explanation for the phenomenon, and I think to extend the frontiers of science you have to go from here...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top