Is M a Subspace of V if S and T are Linear Maps from V onto W?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adottree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
adottree
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
S,T: V onto W are both linear maps. Show that M:={x out of V s.t. Sx out of Range(T)} is a subspace of V

I know that to show M is a subspace of V I must show:

i. 0 out of M
ii. For every u, v out of M, u+v out M
iii. For every u out of M, a out of F, au out of M.

I just don't know how to start it, can someone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are using "out of" where I would use "in" but I understand what you need.

First, as I have pointed out before. You do not need to show that 0 is in M. Since 0v= 0 (the 0 vector), show that M is closed under scalar multiplication immediately gives you that.

M is (in my language!) the set of all vectors, x, in V such that Sx is also in the range of T: there exist some y in V such that Sx= Ty.

Okay, suppose x1[/sup] and x2 are in M- that is, there is y2 in V such that Sx1= Ty1 and y2 such that Sx2= Ty2. What can you say about S(x1+ x2).

Now suppose x is in M- that is, there is y in V such that Sx= Ty- and a is in F. What can you say about S(ax)?
 
S(x1 + x2) = S(x1) + S(x2) (this is because S is a linear map)
= T(y1) + T(y2) = M(x1) + M(x2)

and

S(ax) = aS(x) = aT(y) = aM(x)


Thanks for your help, is this kind of right?
 
adottree said:
S(x1 + x2) = S(x1) + S(x2) (this is because S is a linear map)
= T(y1) + T(y2) = M(x1) + M(x2)

and

S(ax) = aS(x) = aT(y) = aM(x)


Thanks for your help, is this kind of right?

You should not be saying "M(x1)", "M(x2)", or "M(x)" since they are meaningless. M is not a linear map, it is a subspace of V.
 
S(x1 + x2) = S(x1) + S(x2) (this is because S is a linear map)
= T(y1) + T(y2) therefore (x1 +x2) in M

and

S(ax) = aS(x) = aT(y) therefore (ax) in M


I think this is better (I hope)! Thanks you've been a great help!
 
just to make it complete you should write:

S(x1 + x2) = S(x1) + S(x2) (this is because S is a linear map)
= T(y1) + T(y2) = T(y1+y2)

so you can se that S(x1+x2) is in the range of T, namly hit by y1+y2 under T.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top