Is M.S. Atmospheric Science as challenging as a math major with a physics minor?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating the difficulty of a graduate program in Atmospheric Physics at the University of Maryland-BC, particularly in relation to a math major and physics minor background. Key prerequisites include Intro. to Partial Differential Equations (PDE) and Complex Analysis, which are necessary for advanced courses like Methods of Mathematical Physics and Quantum Mechanics. The conversation highlights the subjective nature of course difficulty, suggesting that it varies based on the professor's approach. To gauge the program's rigor, participants recommend reaching out to current students for insights and reviewing the course website for organization and availability of materials, as well-structured resources often indicate a better learning experience.
Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
Surprise, surprise! Another graduate program I'm considering at my university. I'm wondering how this would compare difficulty-wise to my math major, physics minor. It looks like most of the classes I'd take have Intro. to PDE as a prerequisite, e.g. Atmospheric Physics/Chemistry, etc. For my electives, I'd take the Intro. to PDE, Intro. to Complex Analysis so I could take the graduate-level Methods of Mathematical Physics.

University of Maryland-BC has an interesting Atmospheric Physics program that requires Methods of Mathematical Physics and Quantum Mechanics. Of course, I've already taken the undergrad QM course.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Guess we don't have a lot of atmospheric scientists on here.
 
Isn't this a bit like asking, "how long is a piece of string?" Any course in any subject is as hard as a professor wants to make it. Try and get in touch with current students and ask them how hard the course is. Check out the course web site. If it's badly organised, or has little information that's a bad sign. If all the course material is online, that's the best sign!
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top