Is Machine Design important for Aerospace Engineering?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relevance of Machine Design in the context of Aerospace Engineering, particularly from the perspective of Mechanical Engineering students transitioning into Aeronautical Engineering. Participants explore the importance of Machine Design in relation to various engineering principles and its applicability to aerospace projects, including engines and manufacturing processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of Machine Design for aerospace engineers, noting that it is not a required subject for aerospace students at their college.
  • Another participant, with a background in Mechanical Engineering, explains that Machine Design involves understanding the effects of aerodynamic loads and stresses, which may be relevant for analyzing components like turbine blades.
  • Some participants suggest that while Machine Design is interesting, it may not be directly applicable for aerospace engineers focused on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and other specialized areas.
  • A participant shares insights from a visit to Airbus, highlighting that many engineers are involved in designing machines that manufacture airplanes rather than the airplanes themselves.
  • Discussion includes the role of in-house engineering for manufacturing processes and the importance of proprietary designs, which may require knowledge of Machine Design.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for coding skills in aerospace engineering, mentioning programming languages like MATLAB, Fortran, and Python as valuable for future work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the importance of Machine Design for aerospace engineers. Some argue it is crucial for understanding mechanical aspects of aerospace components, while others suggest it may not be as relevant compared to other subjects like CFD. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall necessity of Machine Design in the aerospace field.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the relevance of Machine Design may depend on specific career paths within aerospace engineering, and there are varying opinions on its applicability to different roles in the industry.

ramzerimar
Messages
178
Reaction score
23
I'm a Mechanical Engineering student intending to pursue a Master's Degree in Aeronautical Engineering after college, and Machine Design is one of the disciplines I'm going to take next year. I understand the importance of various topics in mechanical engineering to an aircraft project (topics like elasticity and plasticity, fluid dynamics, thermodynamics and heat transfer), but what about machine design? It's probably a important subject if we are talking about the airplane engines, turbines... But I find interesting that the aerospace engineering students at my college are not required to take those classes. Isn't machine design an important subject for aerospace engineers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
M.E. here (I took Machine Design I and II in undergrad). Machine design gets into the effects of what the aero loads actually do. A.E.'s are typically given a set of thermal and fluid boundary conditions (density, fluid properties, object velocity, the angle of attack, etc.) and compute a set of air pressure loading conditions on a surface. M.E.'s then typically take those mapped aero pressure loads (often with temperatures mapped on an external surface as well) along with acceleration loads and see what the effects are from those conditions. Those effects are seen as the material strain from which the FEA programs calculate stress. Then ultimately margins of safety are calculated based on the mechanical material properties (aka allowables).

Machine design typically discusses the basic beams, columns, plates, etc and then gets into more advanced things: bolts, gears, clutches, pulleys etc. Honestly, it may not be all that applicable to an A.E. who wants to do CFD. If you're just taking it as an elective, go for it, but if there's something more applicable to what you want to do such as an advanced comp flow or CFD class--I'd recommend taking that instead. Like you said, understanding the effects of what aero and thermal loading conditions can do to turbines may help you to provide better insight and design assistance into turbofan and turbojet aircraft engines, etc. As I've mentioned, typically it would be the M.E.'s analyzing the actual turbine blades, shafts etc. for high-stress conditions from the information the A.E.'s provide. Another area that I can't stress enough is coding for an A.E.; many of our A.E.'s are VERY well-versed in MATLAB, Fortran, and Python and I would recommend taking as many classes in that area as possible. Good luck!
 
CmRock314 said:
M.E. here (I took Machine Design I and II in undergrad). Machine design gets into the effects of what the aero loads actually do. A.E.'s are typically given a set of thermal and fluid boundary conditions (density, fluid properties, object velocity, the angle of attack, etc.) and compute a set of air pressure loading conditions on a surface. M.E.'s then typically take those mapped aero pressure loads (often with temperatures mapped on an external surface as well) along with acceleration loads and see what the effects are from those conditions. Those effects are seen as the material strain from which the FEA programs calculate stress. Then ultimately margins of safety are calculated based on the mechanical material properties (aka allowables).

Machine design typically discusses the basic beams, columns, plates, etc and then gets into more advanced things: bolts, gears, clutches, pulleys etc. Honestly, it may not be all that applicable to an A.E. who wants to do CFD. If you're just taking it as an elective, go for it, but if there's something more applicable to what you want to do such as an advanced comp flow or CFD class--I'd recommend taking that instead. Like you said, understanding the effects of what aero and thermal loading conditions can do to turbines may help you to provide better insight and design assistance into turbofan and turbojet aircraft engines, etc. As I've mentioned, typically it would be the M.E.'s analyzing the actual turbine blades, shafts etc. for high-stress conditions from the information the A.E.'s provide. Another area that I can't stress enough is coding for an A.E.; many of our A.E.'s are VERY well-versed in MATLAB, Fortran, and Python and I would recommend taking as many classes in that area as possible. Good luck!
Machine Design is a compulsory subject at my college for all mechanical engineers. I think the subject is interesting, but as I said, I intend to pursue a career in aerospace after undergrad, and I don't know if it will be that important.
As for coding, I'm working towards that! I'm learning Python and soon enough will start learning MATLAB. Looks like Fortran is very used, right? So I better give a look at that also.
 
A few years back, I visited Airbus in Hamburg. They have more than a thousand engineers. I asked why they needed so many - don't they already have the airplane designs? It turns out most of them don't design airplanes. They design machines that make airplanes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule, CalcNerd and ramzerimar
Vanadium 50 said:
A few years back, I visited Airbus in Hamburg. They have more than a thousand engineers. I asked why they needed so many - don't they already have the airplane designs? It turns out most of them don't design airplanes. They design machines that make airplanes.
That's interesting to know. What kinds of machines do you talk about? Like manufacturing machines? I thought those would be designed by third-party companies.
 
ramzerimar said:
I thought those would be designed by third-party companies.

I can't answer that. I can only tell me what they told me.
 
All of the precision engine parts are going to be third party, but much of the sheet metal forming and assembly machines are in house or often modified after purchase. At one aircraft plant where I worked as a machine repair tech, I always laughed at how the PR literature would emphasize how we formed the structural rib of a particular plane out of a mold AND then put the part on the CNC table (the metallurgy of Cast vs rolled was probably the main reason IT WASN'T DONE like this). This particular Rib was the body piece for this plane was approximately a 5'x6'x1' piece. And I suspect that later, perhaps the plane was made by some mold process, but the first ten... Well they were made by putting a (humongous) 5'x6'x1' block of aluminum on a large CNC six axis machine (the size of a small rail car) that simply cut the rib out (it had to be flipped once). Each plane had approx. 10 ribs, each unique (total of 100 ribs). So, some CNC programmer (or several, I imagine) had to write a CNC program for each rib.
.
I was also introduced to ultrasonic welding where composite parts were joined by using spot welding vs rivets. Much of the engineering was done custom as the only customer that would need this is the actual aircraft company. And going to a third party vendor might allow a competitor to use your process to help the competition vs keeping the design in-house, will allow the parent company to keep a 5-10 year edge on certain proprietary processes.
.
All of the above required the plant engineers to be very knowledgeable in machine design.
 
ramzerimar said:
I'm a Mechanical Engineering student intending to pursue a Master's Degree in Aeronautical Engineering after college, and Machine Design is one of the disciplines I'm going to take next year. I understand the importance of various topics in mechanical engineering to an aircraft project (topics like elasticity and plasticity, fluid dynamics, thermodynamics and heat transfer), but what about machine design? It's probably a important subject if we are talking about the airplane engines, turbines... But I find interesting that the aerospace engineering students at my college are not required to take those classes. Isn't machine design an important subject for aerospace engineers?

Again, as I've asked many others who have this type of question regarding their curriculum, have you asked this question to your academic advisor, or even a professor (preferably someone you like and admire) in your department?

Zz.
 
@ramzerimar :

Depends on how good an engineer you want to be .

Many of the people who go into engineering with very theoretical backgrounds and little practical knowledge end up as being basically low grade programmers and data entry clerks .

If you want to be a real engineer and do original creative work then you need an extensive knowledge of the both the theory and the practice of many different branches of engineering .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule and CalcNerd

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K