Is MinutePhysics (youtube) a reliable source?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 42Physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Source Youtube
AI Thread Summary
MinutePhysics is generally considered a reliable source for introductory physics concepts, as its creator, Henry Reich, holds a master's degree in physics and works with reputable institutions like the Perimeter Institute. However, the videos often involve significant oversimplification and analogies aimed at non-technical audiences, which can lead to misunderstandings if viewers take these analogies as absolute truths. While the explanations are engaging and provide a broad overview of complex topics, they may not fully capture the depth required for a comprehensive understanding of physics. Some critiques highlight inaccuracies in political commentary and claims about educational content in US physics classes, suggesting a need for viewers to supplement their learning with more rigorous resources. For deeper understanding, alternatives like Khan Academy, Academic Earth, and Coursera are recommended, along with channels that offer more detailed explanations, such as DrPhysicsA.
42Physics
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Is MinutePhysics (youtube) a reliable source? I've been watching his videos since they started, but some of the stuff he mentions I question, or is Physics so amazing that I can't believe it xD?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't watch the channel, but looking up Henry Reich let's you see that he's got a master's degree in physics, and is working for the Perimeter Institute, as well as collaborating with people like Neil Turok. Meaning, you can assume he probably knows his stuff.

If there's something specific from there that you feel is not right, make a thread about it and we'll try our best to explain.


And if you're looking for other video-type physics education, look up Khan Academy.
For college-level courses check Academic Earth or Coursera(off the top of my head).
 
I've brought a couple minutes physics videos to math/physics professors, inquiring about their authenticity, and the impression they've all given me is that there is often a good deal of oversimplification to deal with non-technical audiences, but the ideas and explanations are good.
 
Vorde said:
I've brought a couple minutes physics videos to math/physics professors, inquiring about their authenticity, and the impression they've all given me is that there is often a good deal of oversimplification to deal with non-technical audiences, but the ideas and explanations are good.
This is my impression.

The videos are oversimplification and analogies. The only bad part is people who take the analogies as absolute truth.
 
To me, they're enjoyable to watch. They give you a VERY broad overview/oversimplification of extremely complex physical concepts, so you definitely have to do more research outside his videos.
 
Also some of the more political videos are ripe with naivety and lack of knowledge like the video where he claims that photons and atomic structure are not taught in US physics class which is either semantics or lack of knowledge of the chemistry curriculum which has these topics. Followed by a list of topics which I can't possibly see fitting in a yearlong curriculum in physics. University lecturers have enough trouble teaching some of these topics as their own self contained class with more mathematically prepared students like with chaos theory.

You could get more tangible knowledge by viewing vids like
http://www.youtube.com/user/DrPhysicsA?feature=g-high-c
although they arent as flashy.
 
Last edited:
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top