Is more than 1 PhD a waste of time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PNutMargarine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phd Time
AI Thread Summary
Pursuing a second PhD in computer science after obtaining a PhD in pure mathematics is generally considered unnecessary. While there are specific professional scenarios, such as in medical physics, where individuals with PhDs in other fields may pursue additional qualifications, it is rare to see someone obtain a second PhD. Typically, professionals opt for post-PhD certificates or master's degrees to gain the necessary credentials. The primary value of a PhD lies in developing independent research skills, which are not significantly enhanced by pursuing another PhD. For those seeking in-depth knowledge in a new field, more efficient alternatives exist beyond obtaining a second doctoral degree.
PNutMargarine
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Say you have a PhD in pure mathematics but want credentials for computer science for some reason where it might be necessary (is there such a situation?). Is it a waste of time to also get another PhD in computer science?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally speaking, yes.

An exception might be for professional cases. In medical physics it's not uncommon for people with PhDs in other branches of physics to go through a medical physics graduate program, but I've never seen anyone go through with a second PhD. Usually they either get a post-PhD certificate or a master's degree - enough so that they can go on to enter the profession.

A PhD is largely about learning the skills to research independently. Once you have those, repeating that training is just an excercise in futility. The other thing you get is an in-depth knowledge of a particular field, but there are more efficient ways to get that if that's all you're lacking.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
124
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top