Is Mu-Metal the Solution for High Permeability Applications?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hami Hashmi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Applied Current
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties and applications of mu-metal, particularly in relation to its permeability and effectiveness in magnetic shielding. Participants explore various scenarios involving the interaction of mu-metal with magnetic fields and currents, questioning its use in high permeability applications such as electric motors and comparing it with other materials like soft iron and Metglas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire whether applying a current to an insulated wire wrapped around a mu-metal box would magnetize the mu-metal or create a magnetic field inside or outside the box.
  • There is a suggestion that mu-metal's high permeability makes it suitable for shielding, but its tendency to saturate quickly limits its application in high energy density scenarios.
  • Participants question the differences between mu-metal and soft iron, noting that both have high permeability but behave differently in magnetic fields.
  • Some mention Metglas, which has a higher permeability than mu-metal, and question why it is not more commonly used in shielding applications.
  • There is confusion regarding the term "solubility" in the context of magnetic properties, with some participants suggesting it may be a miscommunication for "susceptibility."
  • The discussion includes references to hysteresis and its relevance to magnetic absorption, with participants expressing interest in understanding these concepts further.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness and application of mu-metal compared to other materials, with no consensus reached on the best choice for high permeability applications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific conditions under which mu-metal is preferred or its limitations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of geometry and the presence of gaps in shielding effectiveness, as well as the need for clarity in definitions and terms used in the discussion.

  • #31
Does mu metal have a negative susceptibility and soft iron have a positive susceptibility?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
If the magnetic susceptibility is greater than zero, the substance is said to be "paramagnetic"; the magnetization of the substance is higher than that of empty space. If the magnetic susceptibility is less than zero, the substance is "diamagnetic"; it tends to exclude a magnetic field from its interior.
 
  • #33
Hami Hashmi said:
If the magnetic susceptibility is greater than zero, the substance is said to be "paramagnetic"; the magnetization of the substance is higher than that of empty space. If the magnetic susceptibility is less than zero, the substance is "diamagnetic"; it tends to exclude a magnetic field from its interior.
So which is used for magnetic shielding, and why? Did you read the tutorials at the Magnetic Shield Corp. website that I linked to?
 
  • #34
Also, from your original question, it sounds like you are trying to figure out how to build something:
Hami Hashmi said:
If you had a box made of mu-metal and and a magnetic material inside the box, then took an insulated wire and wrapped outside the mu-metal box and applied a current, then applied a magnetic field outside the box, which one would magnetize the mu-metal, even for a brief amount of time? Also, if the current outside mu-metal will magnetize it, would applying an insulator on top of the mu-metal help?
Can you say what you are wanting to build? Maybe if we knew that, we could answer your questions in a more helpful way.
 
  • #35
I'm trying to figure out how to block the infinitely strong magnetic and electric field from two electrons that are 0 m apart (since the electric field is dependent on the distance between the two charges and the magnetic field is dependent on the electric field). I know this is not practical but i just want to see if i can do it.
 
  • #36
And i did read most of those articles (the ones relating to magnetic shielding) but the only thing i found was that mu-metal has a low coercivity so it absorbs electric fields.
 
  • #37
Hami Hashmi said:
the only thing i found was that mu-metal has a low coercivity so it absorbs electric fields.
No, that is not correct. mu-metal is not used for electric field shielding, and the value of Hc is not directly related to its magnetic shielding properties and uses.
Hami Hashmi said:
I'm trying to figure out how to block the infinitely strong magnetic and electric field from two electrons that are 0 m apart (since the electric field is dependent on the distance between the two charges and the magnetic field is dependent on the electric field). I know this is not practical but i just want to see if i can do it.
Since this is for a thought experiment, it is especially important that you learn more about magnetic and electric fields at a fundamental level. What is your school background so far? What math and physics classes have you taken? Have you tried using Hyperphysics and the Khan Academy videos to learn more about these subjects? Without a good knowledge of the basic physics involved, it will be very hard for you to think accurately about how to manipulate fields.
 
  • #38
Opps sorry i meant to say magnetic fields.

I'm currently doing university physics but i have not reached the section on magnetic and electric fields yet. As for my math background, i have just started calculus.
 
  • #39
Hami Hashmi said:
I'm trying to figure out how to block the infinitely strong magnetic and electric field from two electrons that are 0 m apart

This isn't going to work.

First, if they are at zero distance apart, where do you put the mu metal? More realistically, atoms are larger than electrons. There's no place to put them. More realistically still, the magnetic properties of a material are properties of the bulk material, not individual atoms. Mu-metal is not an element, it's an alloy. You need between a million and a billion atoms for the bulk properties to fully manifest themselves.
 
  • #40
Here are some files.
 

Attachments

  • #41
@Vanadium 50

I'm not actually going to put mu-metal, i am just trying to figure out how it works differently from soft iron so that i can make the lining similar.
 
  • #42
If you need to use fantastic and non-existent properties of your materials (like their size), why are you restricting the other properties of your non-existent material to be realistic?
 
  • #43
Size?

And the material is theoretically possible except for the distance of the electrons and the up quarks from each other.
 
  • #44
I just need to figure out how to get the lining to absorb the magnetic field from the magnet.
 
  • #45
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
  • #46
Thread will remain closed.

@Hami Hashmi -- you need to learn more basics of E&M and fields and about magnetic materials before you spend too much time thinking up exotic (non-physical) thought experiments. Work through some of the online courses at the Khan Academy, or take some basic physics and EE classes at your local community college. With a better understanding of the physics behind E&M, you will be thinking of even better (and more physical) thought experiments and questions to ask at the PF.

Have fun leaning more E&M. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hami Hashmi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
714
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K