I Is my approach for pascal's law wrong?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Pascal's law in hydraulic lifts, particularly the relationships between piston areas, displacements, and forces. It emphasizes that while mass and volume are conserved in incompressible fluids, the derivation of force relationships must consider acceleration. The participant points out that the equations presented lead to an inverse interpretation of Pascal's law, suggesting a misunderstanding of how force relates to acceleration in this context. They clarify that forces can exist without acceleration, indicating that typical assumptions in these problems may overlook significant factors. The conclusion stresses that modifications to Pascal's law may be necessary when acceleration is not negligible.
Dileep Ramisetty
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In hydraulic lift utilising pascal law, larger piston area is A1 and the smaller piston area is A2
mass in = mass out and volume in = volume out (in-compressible),so
A1*x1=A2*x2 (let x1 and x2 are displacements of respective pistons)
A1*V1 =A2*V2 (on differentiation gives continuity eq)
A1 * acceleration1=A2*acceleration2 (on differentiating again)
as mass flow rates m are equal,
m*A1*acceleration1=m*A2*acceleration2
A1*F1=A2*F2 (is giving me inverse of the pascal law)
please clarify...Thank you
 

Attachments

  • doubt.png
    doubt.png
    1.9 KB · Views: 516
Physics news on Phys.org
m*a1 is not the force on plate 1, no matter what "m" is.
m*a2 is not the force on plate 2, no matter what "m" is.

In particular, you can have a force without any acceleration.

Typically those problems assume that the acceleration is small and can be neglected. Otherwise Pascal's law needs modifications.
 
  • Like
Likes Dileep Ramisetty
Back
Top