Is My Energy Exchange Analysis Accurate for Evaluating My Motor?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating a motor's energy input and output, specifically measuring Joules. The user calculates input Joules using voltage and amperage but acknowledges potential errors in calculating heat output, which should consider both mechanical work and thermal dissipation. It is emphasized that motors typically dissipate only 10-20% of energy as heat, with the majority converted to mechanical work. The user seeks to measure rotor work through a wind-down method and confirms their moment of inertia and rotational kinetic energy calculations. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for accurate methods to assess energy dynamics in unconventional motor setups.
nickec
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a motor I wish to evaluate.

I wish to measure the Joules input and output.

I believe I am making several errors.

Right now I measure the voltage and amperage, calculate watts, and assume that for every second this wattage stays the same. So V*A*seconds = Joules input

To calculate heat output in Joules I use current squared times resistance.

Another energy output is RKE, rotational kinetic energy. I measure RPM, convert to radians per second, determine moment of inertia of the rotating mass, and then use:

RKE = 1/2 * MOI * rps^2

Again, units are Joules.

This is a start. But are there errors above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"To calculate heat output in Joules I use current squared times resistance."

I wouldn't do that. The formula you are using is for a resistor which loses energy by purely thermal means. A motor dissipates energy by doing work and through thermal means. So as long as the motor is spinning, there is some energy being put out as work, and the rest is heat. It won't all go to heat.
 
...most motors operate pretty efficiently, so you shouldn't expect more than 10-20% to be dissipated as heat. The rest is dissipated as mechanical work. To find the heat output, I'd just subtract the mechanical work output from the input.
 
Prologue said:
"To calculate heat output in Joules I use current squared times resistance."

I wouldn't do that. The formula you are using is for a resistor which loses energy by purely thermal means. A motor dissipates energy by doing work and through thermal means. So as long as the motor is spinning, there is some energy being put out as work, and the rest is heat. It won't all go to heat.

In this motor the current is decoupled from the shaft load. It appears that the energy exchange is different from conventional DC motors.

I would like to measure the work done by the rotor. I believe there is a method involving wind downs. You spin up the rotor using an air line and then plot the rpm per unit of time as the rotor slows.

This is one test I need to learn about.
 
russ_watters said:
...most motors operate pretty efficiently, so you shouldn't expect more than 10-20% to be dissipated as heat. The rest is dissipated as mechanical work. To find the heat output, I'd just subtract the mechanical work output from the input.

If I do that, Russ, I have not measured directly, which is my preference. What you propose is an option. However. Since the motor is unconventional I would like to measure several ways if possible.

Are you familiar with determining work from wind down data, Russ?

I believe my Moment of Inertia calculation is correct and have calculated RKE. What is needed, I think, is to calculate the work done by the rotor at various speeds.

In one embodiment I have measured voltage to be 1.27 and average current to be 195 mA. With this input I realize a maximum rpm of 784. The motor windings see a square wave. Duty cycle is adjustable and numbers above are from one set up. Rotating mass is 171 grams.
 
Slight adjustments to system yields over 2600 rpm. Still 1.27 volts. Resistance under 0.5 ohms. Duty cycle roughly 50%. Current source is AA battery. Rotating mass still 171 grams.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top