Is My LED Circuit Safe? Understanding the FET Safe Operating Area

  • Thread starter Thread starter rbelli1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Fet
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the safety of an LED circuit using a 2n7000 FET, with a current under 40mA and a maximum operating current of 200mA. Concerns arise regarding the maximum safe operating area, particularly at 20V and 40mA, which initially appears to exceed safe limits with a 10V gate voltage. However, it is clarified that the power dissipation must remain below the specified safe line to ensure the FET does not overheat. The circuit design is deemed safe as long as the operating conditions stay within the defined limits. Overall, the design meets the necessary specifications for safe operation.
rbelli1
Gold Member
Messages
1,090
Reaction score
445
I am designing a circuit to control an LED. The current will be under 40mA and the 2n7000 FET has a maximum operating current of 200mA continuous. See attached schematic. The switch in my final circuit is actually another IC.

I looked up the http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/2N%2F2N7000.pdf" and everything looked fine until I got to the Maximum Safe Operating Area on page 6.

20 Volts and 40mA are above the safe operating area with 10 Volts on the gate. Vds will be 20V in the off state but very small after the FET turns on. The solid DC line looks like the maximum continuous power dissipation of the device. The dashed line indicates the power dissipation of Rdson with the specified voltages applied.

Will the attached schematic violate the safe area? If so, why? If not what does the the graph mean?

Many thanks to anyone that can clear up my understanding of this FET

BoB
 

Attachments

  • fet.jpg
    fet.jpg
    19.2 KB · Views: 549
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Those plots are just trying to show how much power you can dissipate safely in the FET. X-axis is V, y-axis is I, multiply together to get P. With the right voltage even a current below Ids(max) can be "unsafe" if it causes the FET to over heat due to excess power in the FET.

You notice as the pulse time gets shorter the peak power of the pulse can go up.

Your circuit is below the "safe" line (meaning there will not be too much power in the FET) thus it is safe.
 
So as long as the on state is below the line I will be safe?

BoB
 
In terms of power rating, yes.

You have the other specs covered as well though so I don't think your design will have an issue.
 
Thanks. I was worried that there was some aspect of the care and feeding of FETS that I was unaware of.

BoB
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top