Is My Logarithm Solution Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Essnov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic Weird
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a logarithm problem where the values of logb(9) and logb(2) lead to confusion regarding the base b. The participant, Essnov, correctly calculated logb(5throot(36)) as 0.5 but expressed uncertainty about the validity of the logarithmic values provided. Other contributors acknowledged the correctness of Essnov's solution while highlighting the inconsistency in the values of b derived from the given logarithms. Suggestions were made to rephrase the question to avoid confusion and better assess students' understanding of logarithmic rules. Ultimately, Essnov reported achieving a perfect score on the exam, indicating successful comprehension despite the initial confusion.
Essnov
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I got this problem in an exam today, and I think I may have the right answer but I don't understand how I'm supposed to know if I do. It's very confusing.


Homework Equations


If logb (9) = 1.5 and logb (2) = 0.5 what is logb (5throot(36))?


The Attempt at a Solution


So here it seemed futile to try and find b because it seems to have 2 different values at once. Here's what I did...:

logb 9 + logb 2 + logb 2 = 1.5 + 0.5 + 0.5
logb 36 = 2.5
1/5 logb 36 = 0.5
logb 5throot(36) = 0.5
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am confused on your notation. What base are we working in? b or ()
 
Sorry about that.

It is base b.
 
What you've done is completely correct. If log_b 9= 1.5 and log_b= .05, then log_b ^5\sqrt{36}= 0.5. But this is a very peculiar question- you are also correct that there is no value of b satisfying those conditions. In fact, log_b 2= 0.5 and log_b ^5\sqrt{36}= 0.5 is obviously impossible since 2 \ne ^5\sqrt{36}!
 
HallsofIvy said:
since 2 \ne ^5\sqrt{36}!


It does to one decimal place. The question is testing the students' knowledge of the rules of logarithms. The IF in the question does give some leeway.

Essnov is obviously smart enough to realize that log_b(9)=1.5 and log_b(2)=0.5 implies two different values for b, which confused him (her?)

So in trying to keep the question simple (introducing an explanation about decimal places into the question would just misdirect a lot of students) it has placed concerns into Essnovs mind.

Well done Essnov for answering it as it was wanted despite this.
 
Last edited:
Maths is quite hard enough when it is written down precisely.

Pretending that 2^5 = 36, not 32 isn't maths, it's nonsense.
 
If log_b(9)=1.5 how do you write b precisely?
 
log_b9=\frac{ln9}{lnb}=1.5 \Rightarrow lnb=\frac{ln9}{1.5} \Rightarrow b=e^{ln9/1.5}
 
b = 81^{1/3} would be another way.
 
  • #10
I agree. Now suppose this was about learning to use a mathematical technique in say an engineering context and hence you needed a decimal number so you could apply a measurement. How precise would you give the answer?
 
  • #11
jing said:
I agree. Now suppose this was about learning to use a mathematical technique in say an engineering context and hence you needed a decimal number so you could apply a measurement. How precise would you give the answer?

In this case, I would use more than one decimal place to avoid the confusion that has arisen! You say

Essnov is obviously smart enough to realize that log_b(9)=1.5 and log_b(2)=0.5 implies two different values for b, which confused him (her?)

Now, if I was teaching, I would set the question such that the "smart enough" students are not punished for being intelligent enough to find the question confusing.

But then, I'm not a teacher. However, there are plenty of questions one can ask to enable the student to practice the rules of logarithms, without causing such confusion!
 
  • #12
A better version of the question might be

If logb (9) = x and logb (2) = y, what is logb (5throot(36))?

That question requires the same knowledge of log functions to solve it, but skips the arithmetic.
 
  • #13
AlephZero said:
A better version of the question might be

If logb (9) = x and logb (2) = y, what is logb (5throot(36))?

That question requires the same knowledge of log functions to solve it, but skips the arithmetic.

But using algebra adds an extra level of difficulty.

[as an aside in this case I would state:

When logb (9) = x and logb (2) = y, what is logb (5throot(36))?

]

Would you settle for

If logb(9) = 1.51 and logb(2) = 0.48, what is logb(5throot(36))? ?
 
  • #14
Thanks all for input.

Got my exam results yesterday - scored 100%.
 
Back
Top