Is my understanding of Einstein right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the perception of Einstein's contributions to physics, particularly in relation to Quantum Mechanics. A PBS documentary criticized Einstein for failing to unify Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, suggesting he might have changed his views had he lived longer. However, participants argue that Einstein's critics often lack a deep understanding of his work and the historical context of his debates with other physicists. They emphasize that despite his criticisms, Einstein made significant contributions to Quantum Mechanics and had a strong track record of adapting his theories based on new evidence. The conversation concludes that many criticisms of Einstein are unfounded, as he remains a pivotal figure in the field.
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
My background is Mathematics. I'm thinking about learning Physics as a hobby. I know a little Physics from courses and research I did in college. I rented from the public library a few weeks ago a PBS documentary on Einstein because I wanted to have a basic idea of his life and theories. The video was very critical of Einstein. It said that shortly before Einstein died, Quantum Mechanics had become a popular theory and Einstein had desperately tried to unify the field of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics but had failed to do so. They said that if Einstein was alive today to see Quantum Mechanics, he might've changed his mind about many things.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Such documentary are often scripted by illiterate people who have no knowledge and even less understanding of the debates Einstein had on these questions with prominent physicists of that time. Remember also that Einstein won the Nobel price for its contribution to quantum mechanics.

Have a read at this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr–Einstein_debates

and then switch to the hard side for which you are well prepared.
 
Or read a good biography of Einstein: "Subtle Is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein" by Abraham Pais.
 
Einstein critics

No one has had more critics than Einstein. People are still trying to prove him wrong on various points. The thing about critics is they criticize.
With a degree in math, you are well prepared to learn physics. Ordinary and partial differential equations, vector analysis, some sadistics(sic), form the basics, then tensors for general relativity.
Bits and pieces of other stuff are usually worked into the physics courses, same for tensors.
 
Einstein had a huge impact on quantum mechanics. Do yourself a favor and stop taking those videos seriously.
 
Jamin2112 said:
They said that if Einstein were alive today to see Quantum Mechanics, he might've changed his mind about many things.
Einstein's track record for reconsidering when presented with new data/results that challenged his thinking was very good. So it's quite likely that if he had lived to see some of these new developments, he would have had incorporated them into his thinking, and we'd all have been the richer for it.

If there is one development that I really wish Einstein had lived to see (and he only missed by a few years) it would be Bell's theorem.

he video was very critical of Einstein. It said that ... Einstein had desperately tried to unify the field of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics but had failed to do so.
And so far no one else has succeeded either, so I don't find that criticism especially compelling. It never ceases to amaze me that Einstein is so often criticized for not achieving more by people who have achieved far less.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
87
Replies
43
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top