Is Negative Drag a Real Concept in Fluid Dynamics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mista_chewey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Drag
AI Thread Summary
Negative drag is not a recognized concept in fluid dynamics, as drag is defined as a force opposing an object's motion through a fluid. Thrust, which propels an object forward, is fundamentally different from drag and cannot be equated to negative drag. The term "negative drag" is misleading and lacks a proper mathematical or engineering basis. While both thrust and drag are forces, they serve opposite functions in fluid dynamics. Therefore, the understanding that thrust and drag are distinct and not interchangeable is accurate.
mista_chewey
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
my first post but i had to get this out before i explode!
this has been bugging me to hell

on this other forum i visit. there are a bunch of people insisting on "negative drag"
is there such a thing?

from what i understand drag is a force acting on an object moving through a fluid.
and thrust is a force propelling the object through the liquid.

so negative drag would be a force enacted on the object by the fluid in the direction of movement. so the object will be propelling itself wouldn't it?

there is also another statement that says "thrust IS negative drag"
thrust is constantly trying to over come drag so how can they be the same thing?

so is it the same thing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Negative drag is not a proper term. The word "drag" has a very specific meaning associated with it along with a mathematical/engineering definition. The engineering definition alone prevents the usage in the way that you are saying. There is absolutely no reason to use a term like "negative drag." Would any of these people say something like "you need to negative push to open the door?"

They are the same thing in that they are both forces, but that is the extent of their similarities.
 
so my understanding of thrust and drag is correct right?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top