Is Neuralink the future of brain-computer interfaces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sciencel0ver
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential success of Neuralink in developing a functional brain-computer interface (BCI) by 2050, with participants expressing skepticism about its impact on society. There are questions about whether such technology could lead to human extinction, similar to the implications of full dive virtual reality, and whether it would change the necessity for physical experiences like travel. The consensus suggests that while Neuralink may achieve some level of functionality, significant societal changes are unlikely in the near future. The conversation highlights a distinction between virtual and real experiences, noting that people still prefer physical interactions over digital communication despite advancements in technology. The thread concludes with a moderation note, redirecting discussions about the research to a more appropriate forum.
sciencel0ver
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys
smile.png


What is the chance of Neuralink succeeding where we actually get a working brain-computer interface in percentage 50/50 more? less? Yes, I know that there are other types of BCIs but I am referring to Neuralink here?

Will we get one by 2050?

Will it cause human extinction in a manner similar to full dive VR? Or will people still need to feed themselves, go to work etc.
Will physical travel still exist such as most people still be flying on planes and enjoying another country/place in real life or will most people travel virtually?

Are you skeptical of Neuralink?
 
Technology news on Phys.org
Even if they get *something* that works, I think the mass change to civilization is a way off. Everyone has been hyping AR and VR for years, but it still mostly hasn't changed the way anyone lives their lives.

When people aren't physically present, the standard has been to decouple communication - we went from live voice conversations to email and text. You can video call people all you want right now, but text still completely dominates it. But when people are in the same room, they still talk instead of text each other. You asked if people will still fly on planes and travel, I think the answer is probably yes, since we seem to basically have two modes - actual real experience mode, and not real experience mode. In the latter, it turns out people don't actually seem to want the experiences being as realistic as they can possibly be made.
 
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
Thread will stay closed.

@sciencel0ver -- If you want to discuss the research into brain-electronics interfaces, you need to start a new thread in the Biology forum and post links to the peer-reviewed published research on the subject. Ask specific questions about those research results, and please stay away from the societal ramifications of the work -- those are way to speculative to address at this time. Thank you.
 
Dear Peeps I have posted a few questions about programing on this sectio of the PF forum. I want to ask you veterans how you folks learn program in assembly and about computer architecture for the x86 family. In addition to finish learning C, I am also reading the book From bits to Gates to C and Beyond. In the book, it uses the mini LC3 assembly language. I also have books on assembly programming and computer architecture. The few famous ones i have are Computer Organization and...
I have a quick questions. I am going through a book on C programming on my own. Afterwards, I plan to go through something call data structures and algorithms on my own also in C. I also need to learn C++, Matlab and for personal interest Haskell. For the two topic of data structures and algorithms, I understand there are standard ones across all programming languages. After learning it through C, what would be the biggest issue when trying to implement the same data...

Similar threads

Back
Top