Is Obama fueling the Gate's incident?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter waht
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the incident involving President Obama’s comments on the arrest of scholar Henry Louis Gates Jr. by Cambridge police. Participants explore the implications of Obama's remarks, the actions of the police, and the broader societal issues related to race and authority. The scope includes public perception, media representation, and the intersection of race and law enforcement.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the appropriateness of Obama's statement that the police "acted stupidly," suggesting it was premature without full details of the incident.
  • Others argue that Obama's comments may have exacerbated the situation, with one participant suggesting he should apologize to the officer involved.
  • There are mixed views on Gates' behavior, with some asserting he should have cooperated more with the police, while others defend his right to express frustration in his own home.
  • Several participants highlight the police officer's background as an expert in racial profiling, raising questions about the appropriateness of the arrest given his expertise.
  • Some argue that the incident reflects broader issues of race relations in America, with claims that it exemplifies ongoing racial tensions and perceptions of authority.
  • Participants express differing opinions on whether Gates' actions constituted disorderly conduct, with some insisting that being confrontational with police is unacceptable regardless of location.
  • There are references to the potential political ramifications for Obama, with one participant suggesting this incident could impact his re-election chances.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views remain regarding the appropriateness of Obama's comments, the actions of the police, and Gates' behavior. The discussion reflects a range of opinions on race, authority, and public perception.

Contextual Notes

Participants express various assumptions about the incident, including differing interpretations of Gates' actions and the police response. The discussion is influenced by personal experiences and societal perceptions of race and authority, which remain unresolved.

  • #211
Count Iblis said:
Not only is there abuse of power by police, there is also abuse of power by prosecutors, http://blog.law.northwestern.edu/bluhm/2009/02/latest-illinois-exoneree-alan-beaman.html"

I'm sure if it was a black cop white person scenario where the white person treated the black cop rudely just because the cop was black and he was white it would be a whole new ball game right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #212
turbo-1 said:
Being treated as a break-in suspect in my own home and having a cop come into my home uninvited with no warrant would have ticked me off. Here he is, an older man who walks with the aid of a cane, who answers the front door to find himself a suspect in a break-in.
He was more than just a suspect, he was guilty. He, and his driver, physically forced the front door to gain entry.

If you would get angry under such circumstances, then you sir have a serious problem.

Still, Crowley treated him as a suspect, not as a possible victim of a break-in.
Of course. Not only did he had eyewitness testimony that the people who broke in haven't yet left, but Gates was being combative too.

Gates had a pretty good reason to feel that race might have been a factor in his treatment,
Gates was already convinced race was a factor upon the initial greeting when he was asked to come outside. (okay, he was convinced he was in real danger -- I assume that to include thinking racial motivation)

because seeing a ~60 year old white man or woman calmly answering the door while making a phone call would probably have prompted the officer to stand down and ask if there had been a break-in or a robbery or any other trouble at the house.
Do you have evidence? Or is this sheer speculation.
 
Last edited:
  • #213
This thread is going way off topic (off topic posts deleted). If and when Obama apologizes, then we can discuss that. Closed.
 
  • #214
Update: Mass. police to release 911 call in Gates arrest
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090727/ap_on_re_us/us_harvard_scholar_calle

Orginially this story was: Cambridge police: Race not mentioned in 911 call
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/nation/6548967.html

. . . .
Lucia Whalen placed the 911 call July 16, saying she saw two men on Gates' front porch who appeared to be trying to force open the front door. . . .

In the statement issued Sunday by attorney Wendy Murphy, Whalen — who has not spoken publicly — said she only saw the backs of the two men and did not know their race when she made the call. Murphy said Whalen, who works nearby, called because she had been aware of recent break-ins in the area and wanted to correct "misinformation" suggesting that she placed the call because the men on the porch were black.

"Contrary to published reports that a 'white woman' called 911 and reported seeing 'two black men' trying to gain entry into Mr. Gates home, the woman, who has olive colored skin and is of Portuguese descent, told the 911 operator that she observed 'two men' at the home," Murphy's statement read.

Murphy said Whalen has been very upset by news reports she believes have unfairly depicted her as a racist.

"She doesn't live in the area. She is by no means the entitled white neighbor ... That has been the theme in the blogs and the implication in some of the mainstream news media," Murphy said in a phone interview Monday.

"She didn't know their race, and it's very clear that she called not because of what they looked like but because of what they were doing."
. . . .
This article dispels some of the rumors and innuendo surrounding the incident.

It's important to wait for facts and not rush to judgement based on hearsay.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 643 ·
22
Replies
643
Views
74K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
12K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
8K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
22K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
11K