I Is Observable A Invariant Under Symmetry Generators G_i?

Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2
How do I know if an observable is invariant, specifically under some set of transformations described via the generators ##G_i##? Which conditions would this observable have to fulfil?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is the observable defined? Can it be written in terms of Gi?
 
dextercioby said:
How is the observable defined? Can it be written in terms of Gi?
It's just a quantum mechanical observable, A. I have no more information than that about it. I'm not sure what ##G_i## is, so I'm not sure if it can be written like that. Strange question really, can't seem to find the answer on google. :)
 
Last edited:
Apparently the answer is that the observable must commute. With what exactly I don't know, but there we are!
 
The observable is represented as an operator "##A##" (say) on Hilbert space. The symmetry generators ##G_i## are represented as operators on the same Hilbert space. The notion that the observable is invariant under those symmetries is implemented by requiring ##[A, G_i] = 0##. I.e., the observable operator must commute with the symmetry generators.

My only other suggestion is: "get thee to a copy of Ballentine" (quickly). :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
strangerep said:
The observable is represented as an operator "##A##" (say) on Hilbert space. The symmetry generators ##G_i## are represented as operators on the same Hilbert space. The notion that the observable is invariant under those symmetries is implemented by requiring ##[A, G_i] = 0##. I.e., the observable operator must commute with the symmetry generators.

My only other suggestion is: "get thee to a copy of Ballentine" (quickly). :oldbiggrin:
Yeah, good plan. Quite a lot of textbooks needed, I think. Thanks for your help! :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top