Is Offshore Geothermal Energy Production Feasible Through Thinner Ocean Crust?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Longstreet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geothermal
AI Thread Summary
Drilling through the thinner ocean crust for geothermal energy production is considered feasible, as the crust is approximately 10km thick, which is less than continental crust. The main challenges include drilling to sufficient depths and maintaining connections at high temperatures. A closed cycle system with heat exchangers and turbomachinery would be necessary to harness the thermal energy effectively. Research and pilot projects, such as those by the University of Hawaii, are exploring this potential. Overall, while the concept is promising, practical implementation requires careful consideration of technical and environmental factors.
Longstreet
Messages
98
Reaction score
1
I was wondering how feasible it would be to drill through the thinner ocean crust to create artificial geothermal spots for energy production. The crust is only about 10km thick, and drills have gone that deep but only on continental crust which is much thicker. I guess drilling and maintaining the connection at that temperature is the main problem. But I would think you wouldn't need to drill all the way through to reach several hundred degrees.

Thanks,
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
One would probably need to install a closed cycle system including heat exchangers, turbomachinery, and generator near the thermal source. The sizing would depend on the max/min temperatures, temperature difference and desirable output.
 
Why bother? Do a search of ocean thermal power. Or go to http://www.eere.energy.gov/RE/ocean.html

I believe the University of Hawaii has a test project.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top