Programs Is one semester of quantum physics enough for a math major?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision of a mathematics major taking physics and engineering courses, specifically regarding whether to skip the second semester of quantum physics to graduate sooner or to take it for a stronger foundation in mathematical physics. The current course covers essential topics like the Schroedinger equation and particle/wave duality, while the next course promises a deeper exploration of quantum mechanics. The individual is weighing the necessity of the second course against their future plans for a master's in applied math, which includes advanced topics in quantum mechanics. It is suggested that the first course may suffice for some graduate-level courses, but the second semester could enhance understanding of quantum mechanics concepts critical for future studies. Ultimately, the advice leans towards not delaying graduation, as graduate programs may still accommodate those who have only completed the first semester. The importance of assessing specific graduate program requirements regarding quantum mechanics is emphasized.
jaskamiin
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
As the title says, I am a mathematics major, but I'm taking extra physics and engineering courses. I'm interested in mathematical physics work in the future.

I'm taking the first of two semesters of quantum physics offered by my school right now. I was planning to take the next course in the spring 2016 semester, but in my hurry to finally graduate, I am debating on whether or not to skip that one and take my last math courses in the spring instead of finishing in the fall 2016 semester (quantum is only offered spring).

Would I be missing out on too much if I decided to skip that course? Or should I go ahead and finish up undergrad and move onto my master's degree (applied math).

BTW, the course I'm taking now covers the following: Planck theory of radiation, photoelectric effect and comptons equation, particle/wave duality, the hydrogen atom, Schroedinger equation (we spend the most time on this), and statistical physics.

The next course gives a "systematic development of quantum mechanical laws, emphasizing solutions to the Schroedinger equation". (Basically a more in-depth look at the equation, I assume).

If it helps, I've taken a full course in PDEs, as well...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That doesn't seem to be proper "quantum mechanics". A proper course in quantum mechanics should show how all the things you mentioned fit in the framework of the following postulates.

http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/preskill/ph229/notes/chap2.pdf Postulates 1 - 4 in section 2.1

http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.6815 Postulates II.1 - II.5 in section 3.1
 
Well, for a math major, the second part of the course would be most interesting to you.

Whether it is a good idea to delay your graduation date depends on whether you'll need QM later. So that depends on what you'll be doing.
 
atyy said:
That doesn't seem to be proper "quantum mechanics". A proper course in quantum mechanics should show how all the things you mentioned fit in the framework of the following postulates.

http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/preskill/ph229/notes/chap2.pdf Postulates 1 - 4 in section 2.1

http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.6815 Postulates II.1 - II.5 in section 3.1

The master's program I have been looking at allows taking a course like this as an elective:

"Students acquire a more deeper knowledge on the nature and the power of quantum mechanics. In particular they know how to apply perturbation theory, to employ scattering theory and to apply symmetry arguments. Students also get in touch with more modern aspects of quantum mechanics like in questions about entanglement, non-localities and the measurement problem."

As well as a mathematical physics course, statistical mechanics, and a course in groups in symmetries.

Basically I'm wondering if the one course I'm taking now would be enough to serve as a base for one/any of these, or if it's necessary to take the second.

micromass said:
Well, for a math major, the second part of the course would be most interesting to you.

Whether it is a good idea to delay your graduation date depends on whether you'll need QM later. So that depends on what you'll be doing.

I guess the problem is that it's hard to know whether or not I will be needing QM at this point... I figured it's a big part of modern mathematical physics, though
 
You might see if the grad programs in applied math you are considering requires two semesters of QM as preparation, or if the admissions prefers two semesters, if you can get this information.

If/When you see QM at the graduate level, my best guess is that the second semester would be good preparation. However, I do not think you should delay graduation in Math for a semester while you take the one course, when you have the opportunity to take QM in grad school. I defintiely think your PDE course will help you when you need to see the Schrodinger's equation in the QM in a future course.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top