Is Our Understanding of the Space of Einstein Metrics Limited?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Naty1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein Space
Naty1
Messages
5,605
Reaction score
40
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0310/0310002v3.pdf
...we show that for many spatial topologies, the Hartle-Hawking wave function for a spacetime with a negative cosmological constant develops sharp peaks at certain calculable geometries.

Can someone explain the following statement on page 2 of the paper regarding "our limited understanding of the space of Einstein metrics"...

...for a wide class of manifolds, the sum over topologies produces sharp peaks in the Hartle-Hawking wave function that could not have been guessed by looking at any single contribution. Because of limits to our present understanding of the space of Einstein metrics, a complete, systematic understanding of this phenomenon is still lacking, but ultimately it may be possible to use this sort of analysis to make testable predictions about the geometry and topology of the Universe.

I'm just asking in general, not specifically related to the paper...Is this general statement relative to our universe as well...one a positive cosmological constant?? How is our knowledge limited?? Does this imply a weakness in relativity?


Separately, anyone aware of any papers looking at a possible relationship between the Hawking-Hartle wave function and uncertainty?? Seems like, maybe, if there were wave function peaks [with a positive cosmological constant] they could be related to virtual particles and maybe quantum uncertainty?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Naty1 said:
I'm just asking in general, not s...fold"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4-manifold
 
More a weakness of a quantum gravity than classical gravity...

ok, that makes sense!
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top