Is Our Universe Intentionally Fostering Life and Intelligence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PIT2
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The Selfish Biocosm hypothesis posits that the universe is inherently inclined towards the emergence of intelligent life, which may not necessarily be human or human-like. This theory suggests that the laws and constants of nature function similarly to DNA, providing a framework for the development and replication of life. It implies that life and intelligence are fundamental aspects of the universe's evolution, encoded within its very fabric. A significant aspect of this hypothesis is the belief in a vast, undiscovered community of life and intelligence across the cosmos, indicating that humanity may share a collective destiny with these entities in shaping the universe's future. This perspective contrasts with traditional evolutionary views, which often regard the emergence of human intelligence as a rare accident. Instead, proponents of the Selfish Biocosm argue that such intelligence may be a probable outcome of evolutionary processes. The discussion also touches on the idea that all matter in the universe could be considered alive in some sense, raising questions about the nature of life and consciousness.
PIT2
Messages
897
Reaction score
2
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/9059/biocosmfrontcover3fw.jpg

The Selfish Biocosm hypothesis[/size]

The essence of the Selfish Biocosm hypothesis is that the universe we inhabit is in the process of becoming pervaded with increasingly intelligent life—but not necessarily human or even human-successor life. Under the theory, the emergence of life and increasingly competent intelligence are not meaningless accidents in a hostile, largely lifeless cosmos but at the very heart of the vast machinery of creation, cosmological evolution, and cosmic replication.[/color] However, the theory does not require or even suggest that the life and intelligence that emerge be human or human-successor in nature.

The hypothesis simply asserts that the peculiarly life-friendly laws and constants that prevail in our universe serve a function precisely equivalent to that of DNA in living creatures on Earth, providing a recipe for development and a blueprint for the construction of offspring.

Finally, the hypothesis implies that the capacity for the universe to generate life and to evolve ever more capable intelligence is encoded as a hidden subtext to the basic laws and constants of nature, stitched like the finest embroidery into the very fabric of our universe.[/color] A corollary—and a key falsifiable implication of the Selfish Biocosm theory—is that we are likely not alone in the universe but are probably part of a vast, yet undiscovered transterrestrial community of lives and intelligences spread across billions of galaxies and countless parsecs. Under the theory, we share a possible common fate with that hypothesized community—to help shape the future of the universe and transform it from a collection of lifeless atoms into a vast, transcendent mind.

The inescapable implication of the Selfish Biocosm hypothesis is that the immense saga of biological evolution on Earth is one tiny chapter in an ageless tale of the struggle of the creative force of life against the disintegrative acid of entropy, of emergent order against encroaching chaos, and ultimately of the heroic power of mind against the brute intransigence of lifeless matter.[/color]

http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0642.html

Another quote:

The conventional wisdom among evolutionary theorists, typified by the thinking of the late Stephen Jay Gould, is that the abstract probability of the emergence of anything like human intelligence through the natural process of biological evolution was vanishingly small. According to this viewpoint, the emergence of human-level intelligence was a staggeringly improbable contingent event. A few distinguished contrarians like Simon Conway Morris, Robert Wright, E. O. Wilson, and Christian de Duve take an opposing position, arguing on the basis of the pervasive phenomenon of convergent evolution and other evidence that the appearance of human-level intelligence was highly probable, if not virtually inevitable. The latter position is consistent with the Selfish Biocosm hypothesis while the Gould position is not.

Complete rubbish or a brilliant insight into the workings of the universe?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well i wouldn't say it was rubbish, then again id hardly say it was a brilliant insight either. Its really nothing i haven't mulled over myself on a lazy sunday afternoon such as this. :-p
Personally id say he's probably nearer the mark than assuming specified consciousness is some weird freak accident. I highly doubt it is, then again its all speculation at this point since we've not even begun to properly investigate other planets and we really have no idea how rare or how common life is.
Hmm i actually just realized something in writting that last line, everything is alive anyway, every particle every atom, i guess in that respect the whole universe is already alive. Planets, moons, stars, meteores - signs of life right in front of us.
What we're really talking about is when living matter groups together to form task driven entities with specialised awareness, as i said before how rare or how common an occurrence this is only time will tell.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top