Is Physics Just a Mathematical Model?

AI Thread Summary
Physics fundamentally relies on mathematical models to describe the relationships between mass, momentum, and energy in time and space. While some argue that mathematics cannot represent reality, the application of concepts like Euclidean geometry demonstrates that abstract models can effectively inform practical applications. The discussion highlights a common confusion among individuals regarding the nature of physical theories and their mathematical foundations. It emphasizes that physics encompasses more than just Euclidean geometry, involving complex logical deductions from abstract principles. Overall, understanding the role of mathematics in physics is crucial for grasping its theoretical framework.
Messages
10,907
Reaction score
3,782
I participated in a recent thread where it was obvious the poster was confused about what physical theories are.

Of course they are mathematical models, but they say the mathematics can't be the reality etc etc. I am sure regular posters here have seen the arguments - they appear with surprising regularity.

What I have never understood is pretty much everyone studies Euclidean geometry at school. All physics does is model itself on that. Points with no part don't exist. Lines with only length don't exist - yet everyone has zero problem applying it from surveyors and engineers, to guys that lay concrete about their house.

But for some reason some get confused about it in physics.

Thanks
Bill
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics uses mathematics and mathematical model to quantitatively describe relationships of mass, momentum and energy of matter and non-matter in time and space.

bhobba said:
. . . Euclidean geometry . . . . All physics does is model itself on that.
Physics is a lot more than Euclidean geometry or models based on Euclidean geometry.
 
Astronuc said:
Physics is a lot more than Euclidean geometry or models based on Euclidean geometry.

Good point.

I was thinking in terms of the principles involved where its a logical deduction from stated abstract postulates.

Thanks
Bill
 
Back
Top