Is Pi the Secret to Understanding Our Finite Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hawaiidude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the implications of recent findings regarding the universe's shape and density, particularly focusing on the dodecahedron model proposed by Weeks. This model suggests that the universe's density should be approximately 1.013, indicating a nearly flat universe, which contrasts with other cosmological models like the eternal inflationary universe. Observations from the WMAP and other instruments are expected to refine this density measurement soon. The conversation also touches on the challenges of reconciling a finite universe with the concept of an infinite pi value. Overall, these findings could significantly impact our understanding of cosmology and the nature of the universe.
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Just wait until next month and it will be a hotdog (or something else).

:)
 
From the article:
"Spergel and his team are now working with Weeks to see if they might somehow have missed the circles. And there is a further test of the dodecahedron model. It predicts that a key measure of the density of matter in the Universe, which governs its curvature, is equal to 1.013.

Completely flat space corresponds to 1, while values greater than or less than 1 would create a curved Universe. Observations of the microwave background radiation so far suggest the value lies somewhere between 1.00 and 1.04. Further observations by WMAP and other instruments should give a more accurate answer within the next few months."

From this, and other observations, I'll go with Weeks and not Spergel. I just don't buy the "six matching circles" requirement.
 
Last edited:
This has some implications for other cosmological models. If this finite model is correct, then several others are ruled. An eternal, inflationary universe is in the toilet, and the brane collision model also comes to mind.
 
how did they figure this out? radio signal?
 
as i understand the the universe would have to have
2/3 more mass to be "closed", do these observations
override predicted criticle mass?
 
WMAP findings among others suggest omega is close to 1. However, the observable matter in the universe is only a third of that number. Hence the notion of matter that does not produce EM radiation.
 
Last edited:
>>...value lies somewhere between 1.00 and 1.04.>>

I suspect it will be shown as closer to 1.0535. And another thought...how to configure a finite universe by an infinite pi value?
 
Back
Top