Is Pluto's Axis of Rotation Almost Perpendicular to Its Orbit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbital
AI Thread Summary
Pluto's polar axis is tilted at 122 degrees, which means it is 32 degrees below its orbital plane, contradicting claims that it is "almost perpendicular" to its orbit. When considering the solar system's axis, this results in an angle of approximately 139 degrees. The discussion highlights the ambiguity in defining "almost perpendicular," as Pluto's slow orbit complicates the comparison to Earth's consistently perpendicular polar axis. Additionally, the tilt of Pluto's orbit relative to its polar axis could yield varying degrees of perpendicularity, ranging from 105 to 139 degrees. Overall, the terminology used in describing Pluto's axial orientation may not accurately reflect its unique orbital characteristics.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,838
Reaction score
7,833
I read in several places (including thenineplanets.org) that Pluto's poles are "almost perpendicular to its orbit". But the actual number I see is 122 degrees. So its polar axis is actually 32 degrees below its plane, right? (meaning that Earth sees the North pole of Pluto in its Southern limb) .

Add that to the plane of its orbit, and we get an angle of Pluto's polar axis compared to the axis of the solar system of more like 139 degrees.

Am I right?

And isn't it a bit inaccurate to say its axis of rotation is almost perpendicular to its orbit?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Perhaps the first issue would be that pluto's orbit is very slow (the pioneer analomaly people would love to have recorded far more of pluto's motion), so it's necessary to distinguish statements about pluto "right now" from statements about pluto's "complete orbit".

Note the language is slightly ambiguous: At some point in it's orbit, it seems the Pluto's rotation axis will (in context) be exceptionally near parallel to orbital velocity, while Earth's polar axis is always "almost perpendicular" to its orbital plane and orbital velocity.

Compared to other planets (the plane of Earth's rotation is so well aligned with the plane of Earth's orbit, you'd attribute it to solar system formation rather than coincidence), I think it is indeed reasonable to point out that those two planes are comparatively very perpendicular in the case of pluto.

That and astronomers know how to do proper uncertainties/statistics (often with small data sets: eg. 8 planets), and they're very accustomed to only expecting order-of-magnitude-ish precision.
 
Depending on which way the orbit is tilted relative to the polar axis, you might want to subtract the two instead of adding them. So it could be 122+17=139 degrees like you said, or 122-17=105 degrees, or any answer inbetween 139 or 105. "Almost" is a subjective term. I guess 105 would be "almost perpendicular".
 
tony873004 said:
Depending on which way the orbit is tilted relative to the polar axis, you might want to subtract the two instead of adding them. So it could be 122+17=139 degrees like you said, or 122-17=105 degrees, or any answer inbetween 139 or 105. "Almost" is a subjective term. I guess 105 would be "almost perpendicular".

I don't think this is so.* See attachment.


*(I can't be sure. I think I'm simplifying the number of planes.)
 

Attachments

  • angle.gif
    angle.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 524
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top