Is Potential Constant on a Conductor?

AI Thread Summary
In a connected conductor, the electric potential at any point is uniform, confirming that for an ideal conductor, the potential is the same throughout. However, the absolute value of the potential is arbitrary and can be defined as zero at any chosen point, lacking intrinsic physical significance. In equilibrium, there is no voltage drop, but if charges are in motion, such as in a current, a voltage drop occurs along the conductor. Superconductors maintain a constant current without a voltage drop, even when current flows. Understanding these principles clarifies the behavior of conductors and superconductors under different conditions.
Sogan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I consider a connected conductor. Is it right, that:

1)the potential at any point of the conductor is the same, but

2)the absolute value of the potential isn't zero in general?

I think these statements are true, but I'm not sure about it, especially with the second statement.

Thank you a lot!

Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1)the potential at any point of the conductor is the same
For an ideal conductor, yes.

2)the absolute value of the potential isn't zero in general?
This value has no meaning. You can define "zero" wherever you want. There are some conventions, depending on the setup, but they do not have a physical meaning themself.
 
Sogan said:
1)the potential at any point of the conductor is the same
mfb said:
For an ideal conductor, yes.

in equilibrium :wink:

(if charges are moving, ie if there is a current, then obviously there is a voltage drop along the conductor, ie an electric potential difference)
 
Thank you very much! Now I understood.
 
tiny-tim said:
(if charges are moving, ie if there is a current, then obviously there is a voltage drop along the conductor, ie an electric potential difference)
In superconductors with constant current, you have no voltage drop, even with a current flow.
If charges are accelerating, you have an electric field and therefore a voltage drop ;).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top