I Is Proton Sphericity Similar to Electron Sphericity?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Islam Hassan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proton
Islam Hassan
Messages
237
Reaction score
5
As I understand, the sphericity or regularity of the electron’s negative charge was tested to exquisite degrees of accuracy by the ACME collaboration in 2013.

If possible, would a measure of the sphericity of the proton’s positive charge be expected to yield similar results?

And regarding the electron, if its sphericity was lower, say, by a couple of orders of magnitude, what implications would that have for particle/atomic physics? Would there be any implications for the manner in which electrons pair to nuclei?IH
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spherical symmetry of the electric field and charge distribution on a proton would change with scale, as protons are composite (made of 3 quarks).
By scale, I mean how far you can "zoom in" on the proton. If you aren't very zoomed in, it will look symmetric. If you are very zoomed in, you will see 3 points of charge.
 
DuckAmuck said:
The spherical symmetry of the electric field and charge distribution on a proton would change with scale, as protons are composite (made of 3 quarks).
By scale, I mean how far you can "zoom in" on the proton. If you aren't very zoomed in, it will look symmetric. If you are very zoomed in, you will see 3 points of charge.
No you won't, as it is not a static situation. There is a constant interchange among them.
 
A proton is static, but it doesn't have unique positions for its constituents.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top