Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" a good book for a beginner?

AI Thread Summary
"Quantum Mechanics Demystified" by David McMahon is considered a suitable resource for beginners with a background in high school physics and undergraduate calculus who wish to self-study quantum mechanics. The book is praised for its clarity, although readers should be vigilant about typos that may appear in derivations. While many recommend this book and others in the Demystified series, some argue that self-study may not be ideal for quantum mechanics. It is suggested that enrolling in a college course could provide valuable guidance from an expert, enhancing the learning experience.
murshid_islam
Messages
468
Reaction score
21
TL;DR Summary: Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" a good book for a beginner for self-studying?

I'm a layman with background in high school physics and undergrad calculus. Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" by David McMahon a good book for self-studying and learning quantum mechanics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's good. All books by McMahon in the demystified series are good. And no, I'm not him. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes Fakhrul Islam, bhobba, dextercioby and 7 others
I also recommend that book ( and his other books ) but you need to keep a close eye on the typos. If you follow any derivations in the book , you should find the typos easy to spot
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Fakhrul Islam, bhobba, murshid_islam and 2 others
murshid_islam said:
TL;DR Summary: Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" a good book for a beginner for self-studying?

I'm a layman with background in high school physics and undergrad calculus. Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" by David McMahon a good book for self-studying and learning quantum mechanics?
QM should not be left to self-study in my opinion. I recommend taking a course at a local college instead. I say that only based on my own experience taking QM in college and the fact that you then have an expert to ask questions of.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top