Is Quantum Physics Non-Locality According to Einstein, Podolski, and Rosen?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 4everlonging
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein
4everlonging
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
what did Einstein,Podolski and Rosen say about quantum physics as a description of nature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See for yourself, in their paper:

http://www.drchinese.com/David/EPR.pdf

The abstract suffices to answer your question, although you might want to read the rest of the paper while you're at it.
 
okay, so then would it be talking about non-locality?
 
Last edited:
Are you going to tell us what part you don't understand?
 
i understand now, after looking at it again, i am just wondering if it is non-locality?
 

Thread 'Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation'

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
View full post »

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Is Maxwell's electromagnetism an effective (field) theory?'

Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Quantum entanglement and hidden variables
Replies
7
Views
2K
What prior experiments justified the notion of entanglement?
Replies
7
Views
1K
I Uncertainty of momentum and position
Replies
1
Views
1K
Einstein podolsky rosen bridge
Replies
3
Views
6K
I Is the fork in the Einstein Podolsky Rosen argument correct?
Replies
45
Views
2K
A Is entanglement based on first principles?
Replies
34
Views
3K
A Mixed quantum state of the Bose-Einstein distribution
Replies
3
Views
810
I Could Hidden Variables Explain Quantum Mechanics without Locality?
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Compatibility of Quantum Mechanics and Special Relativity
Replies
43
Views
5K
Deutsch and Hayden on locality
Replies
7
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top