Is quantum programming really possible?

JakesDev96
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have come here to gather what the communities view is on the possibility of quantum computing in relation to the actual logic behind synchronous programming and the laws that (seem to) govern the quantum realm.

Coming from a background in computer science, I have studied the basic fundamentals of how high and low level programming work. Many of the basic ideas of programming seem to contrast with the ideas of quantum physics. Here is the major problem I see with quantum programming:

Synchronous Tasks - Programming works in steps; just a set of instructions to do one thing at a time. Say you were awaiting a value from one function before passing it off to another. This would involve time, now normally this wouldn't be an issue. However, in the quantum scale, wouldn't time be non existent? Unless we seemed to find the pattern in which information passes in an infinite number of cases that simulate time, I do not see this being possible. With that being said, quantum computing could only perform asynchronous operations.

This would essentially allow for quantum computing, but not practical logical computing.

So, is quantum programming really possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to PF!
JakesDev96 said:
However, in the quantum scale, wouldn't time be non existent?
I don't know why you would think this, there is Planck time which is an incredibly small amount of time, but time still "ticks" in the quantum realm.
JakesDev96 said:
Unless we seemed to find the pattern in which information passes in an infinite number of cases that simulate time, I do not see this being possible.
In quantum computing you still make a query and sit and wait for a result. The quantum algorithms are "different" ways of obtaining results. A popular example is Shor's algorithm.
JakesDev96 said:
So, is quantum programming really possible?
Google it.
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/535621/google-researchers-make-quantum-computing-components-more-reliable/
 
Last edited:
Many of the Quantum algorithms rely on an iterative procedure to produce an answer. Usually these iterations are to enhance the probability of the "right" answer so that it has a high probability of occurring when read out (see the Born Rule in QM). These iterations are what usually reduce the computation time down from exponential to something like quadratic. It still takes time to setup a problem, compute it, and reduce it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top