Is R={0, 2, 4, 6, 8} a Field under Addition and Multiplication Modulo 10?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether the set R={0, 2, 4, 6, 8} forms a field under addition and multiplication modulo 10. The original poster attempts to prove this by exploring the properties of a field, including the existence of a unity and multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the properties of a field, including commutativity, the existence of an additive identity, and the need for additive inverses. There is uncertainty about how to demonstrate that R is a commutative ring and whether certain properties hold within the set.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the properties of addition and multiplication within the set, while others express confusion about specific properties, particularly regarding additive inverses. There is an ongoing exploration of whether the necessary conditions for R to be a field are satisfied.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions and properties of fields and rings, with a focus on verifying the characteristics of R under the specified operations. There is mention of using a Cayley table to demonstrate commutativity, and the discussion reflects a lack of consensus on certain properties being obvious or not.

cmajor47
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let R={0, 2, 4, 6, 8} under addition and multiplication modulo 10. Prove that R is a field.


Homework Equations


A field is a commutative ring with unity in which every nonzero element is a unit.


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the unity of R is 6, and that the multiplicative inverse of 2 is 8, of 3 is 2, of 4 is 4, and of 6 is 6.
So I've shown that each nonzero element is a unit.
I'm not sure how to go about showing that R is a commutative ring.
To show the commutative part, I'm guessing that I can just do out the Cayley table of R.
I don't know how to show that R is a ring without going through all of the characteristics of a ring though. I don't think I need to do that but I'm not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which properties are non-obvious?
 
Well I can clearly see that a+b=b+a, (a+b)+c=a+(b+c), a(bc)=(ab)c, a(b+c)=ab+ac, and (b+c)a=ba+ca, and that there is an additive identity 0 st a+0=a for all a in R
So, I guess the non-obvious property is that there is an element -a in R such that a+(-a)=0, but is this property even true?
 
I claim that what -[/color]a needs to be is obvious, and thus that property holds depending on whether or not that is actually an element of R.


(I use red to indicate it's the putative negation operation on R, rather than the negation operation on the integers modulo 10 which I will express in black)
 
Then I'm not sure what the non-obvious property is.
 
I am hoping that while you found the existence of additive inverses non-obvious earlier, that from my hint you now find it obvious -- or can at least prove it even if it isn't obvious.

So, if that was the only field property that wasn't clear to you, does that mean you are now happy that it's a field?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K