Is ℝ or ℝ2 Bigger in the Upper Right Quadrant of the Unit Square?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johann1301
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
johann1301
Messages
216
Reaction score
1
ℝ or ℝ2? Both are infinite, but is one greater then the other?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
johann1301 said:
ℝ or ℝ2? Both are infinite, but is one greater then the other?
They are both the same size. It's not too difficult to find a one-to-one map between the two spaces, which is enough to show that every point on the real line has a counterpart in R2, and vice versa.
 
It suffices to find a surjection from R to R^2. restricting say to the part of the upper right quadrant in the unit square, somethingn like this might work:

given an infinite decimal .abcdefghijkl..., split it into two infinite decimals (.acegik..., .bdfhjl...). Can you see that every pair of such decimals arises this way?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top