Is R-Programming Useful for Physicists?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmbrwlf730
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
R-programming is highly beneficial for physicists, particularly in data analysis and statistical applications. While many physicists traditionally use custom-built statistics programs due to specific data requirements, R offers extensive capabilities for complex data manipulation and analysis. Its wide range of contributed packages allows for specialized analyses that would be challenging to implement without a strong statistics background. Additionally, R simplifies the analysis of simpler data and enhances graphical representation, making it a valuable tool for students and professionals alike. Familiarity with R is increasingly sought after in job opportunities for physicists, especially in theoretical roles. Those with prior programming experience will find R's power and efficiency particularly advantageous. Overall, taking a class in R is recommended for anyone interested in deepening their understanding of statistical data analysis.
tmbrwlf730
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
A class over data analysis using R-programming is being offered over the summer at my school. I'm taking statistics right now and find it interesting because sometimes in physics labs we would find things like standard deviation and I didn't really understand what was going on. So to my question, is R-Programming useful to physicist and do they really use it? Thank you.
 
Technology news on Phys.org
Although I got a PhD in physics, I am now working as a statistician, so from my point of view it is certainly useful to know a statistics language like SAS or R.

Physicists often tend to rely more on homebrewn statistics programs, which has two reasons in my oppinion:
1. The kind of data require for a tailored application (think of particle collider data).
2. R is relatively little known in the physics community.
In principle you can program all kinds of data manipulation in R, including complex data analysis. So point 1 may not be an obstacle.
One big benefit of R is that people have contributed packages for quite specialized purposes which would be difficult to program whithout a strong statistics background.
On the other hand, it offers easy mechanisms for the analysis of simple data and their graphical representation which might be useful already during your studies.

So, yes, R may be very interesting to learn for a physicist.
 
From a more pragmatic point of view: Many potentially interesting job offers for a (theoretical) physicist (meaning: offers interesting for a physicist, not job offers that explicitly look for physicists) do explicitly mention familiarity R as requirement or sought-for skill. If you already find statistics interesting then I would recommend you to take the class, even if it only is to learn about some possibilities in statistical data analysis.
 
Last edited:
Hey tmbrwlf730 and welcome to the forums.

Absolutely recommend it especially if you have had some programming background in either a standard class or otherwise. If you have done a bit of programming, this will make a lot more sense and you will appreciate how powerful this is than if you didn't.

The biggest selling point for R is that once you have the routines you need to do the stuff you need to do, if you need to create more routines to do some more specialized stuff or if you need to write functions or scripts that do say automated stuff like generating particular outputs (maybe in custom formats), or doing custom calculations that would be hard in something like SAS but too time consuming with a C++ project in a repository, then R is perfect for this.

Remember that the point of software in many cases is to speed up things that are related to what your focus is: R is one way to get things done quicker for many applications (but probably not all) and for this reason it's useful to learn it.
 
Wow, these are all great things to hear. It gets me amped up to take the course. Thank you everyone for taking the time to answer my question. If anyone else has anything to add I would still like to hear it. Thank you again.
 
Thread 'Star maps using Blender'
Blender just recently dropped a new version, 4.5(with 5.0 on the horizon), and within it was a new feature for which I immediately thought of a use for. The new feature was a .csv importer for Geometry nodes. Geometry nodes are a method of modelling that uses a node tree to create 3D models which offers more flexibility than straight modeling does. The .csv importer node allows you to bring in a .csv file and use the data in it to control aspects of your model. So for example, if you...
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...
Back
Top