Is Rank(A) Equal to Trace(AA*) and When Does AB-BA=I Hold?

  • Thread starter Thread starter arthurhenry
  • Start date Start date
arthurhenry
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Rank(A)= Trace(AA*) ??

I have two questions and I hope it is acceptable...Seemingly unrelated, though I came to wonder about the first while thinking the second. Thanks

1)Is this statement true? or is there a statement that relates Rank(A) and Trace(??)

2) AB-BA=I (When does this identity hold if at all? Field can be closed or Z/Z2, or etc)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi arthurhenry! :smile:

The first one is not true. It is true that Rank(A)=Rank(AA*). But it isn't in general true that Rank(AA*)=Trace(AA*). For example, take

A=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 2 & 0\\ 0 & 2\\ \end{array}\right)

Then AA* has rank 2, but the trace is 8.

The second one is not true too. Take A the zero matrix and B an arbitrary matrix.
 


Perhaps I was not clear, I will phrase it correctly:

2)Does there exist matrices A and B such that AB-BA=I holds?

In particular, what is the answer to the question in the case the field is Complex NUmbers and in the case the field is Z/Z2 ?

1) Is rank(A) equal to Trace(A*A) ?

not "is the rank(A*A) equal to Trace (A*A)?" As you have pointed out this one is definittely incorrect.
 


arthurhenry said:
Perhaps I was not clear, I will phrase it correctly:

2)Does there exist matrices A and B such that AB-BA=I holds?

In particular, what is the answer to the question in the case the field is Complex NUmbers and in the case the field is Z/Z2 ?

Well, try it yourself. Take general 2x2-matrices and calculate AB-BA. Then solve the system to see whether they can equal I...

1) Is rank(A) equal to Trace(A*A) ?

not "is the rank(A*A) equal to Trace (A*A)?" As you have pointed out this one is definittely incorrect.

We have that rank(A)=rank(A*A), so the same example applies.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top