News Is Republican Virtue Still Relevant in Modern American Society?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LordofDirT
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the concept of "republican virtue" as it relates to the American Revolution and its relevance in contemporary society. Participants express confusion about the term, questioning whether it refers to Enlightenment ideas from philosophers like John Locke and Adam Smith or to a way of living that includes civic engagement and informed voting. The conversation highlights a perceived disconnect between the ideals of republican virtue, such as liberty, self-determination, and freedom of speech, and current political practices. Some argue that modern interpretations of republican virtue have become convoluted, with critiques of both political parties and their adherence to these ideals. The distinction between republican virtue and political virtue is also discussed, with an emphasis on the role of citizens in maintaining a government that serves the people. Overall, the dialogue reflects a struggle to reconcile historical values with present-day political realities.
LordofDirT
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I have a test on the 29th, and on the take-home essay the professor asks a question.

"Republican virtue was a basic idea of the American Revolution. Does such a thing as "republican virtue" exists anymore in American society?"

I guess I'm a little confused about the term republican virtue. Is this a set of ideas held by the enlightenment philosophers, such as adam smith and John Locke, or is a certain way to live your life. Like staying educated about the topics voted for, or consent of the governed, taxation without representation?

Just confused :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, I guess everyone else is just as confused as I am.
 
When in office they certainly don't forget their friends, but I can't think of many other republican virtues!
 
Ugh, I wish I didn't space out when he explained this.
 
Thanks Evo, that should give me something to work from.
 
LordofDirT said:
Hey,

I have a test on the 29th, and on the take-home essay the professor asks a question.

"Republican virtue was a basic idea of the American Revolution. Does such a thing as "republican virtue" exists (sic) anymore in American society?"

I guess I'm a little confused about the term republican virtue. Is this a set of ideas held by the enlightenment philosophers, such as adam smith (sic) and John Locke, or is a certain way to live your life. Like staying educated about the topics voted for, or consent of the governed, taxation without representation?

Just confused :/

You're taking the class and you aren't familiar with the definition of a critical term?

:::"Hey, professor, I'm unclear as to what oxygen means. Can you help me out?":::

republican virtue: liberty, self-determination, independence, freedom of religion and speech

See also Bill of Rights.

Contrast these with democrat virtues (roughly in order):

the right to kill any unborn baby, any time, for any reason
the right to be offended, continuously, while offending others the more
the right to be housed, fed, clothed, and medicated, at government expense and caveat
the right to make outlandish, misleading, dishonest statements, and then defend them by claiming "the other side does it"
the right to claim "compassion" while promoting abortion and creeping socialism, the most destructive political train wreck in 200 years

See "Who Really Cares" by Arthur C Brooks, an outstanding and enlightening read, sure to be despised by Democrats, who do not come out well.
 
Republican Virtues then, in your opinion, are "the right to dictate to everyone else how they should live based on your personal beliefs". Yeah, sounds perfect.
 
I think the new-age Republican virtue is hypocrisy and fundamentalism?

Actually, now days the Republican party is an uneasy alliance between the corporate (Romney), the Evangelical/creationist (Huckabee), the libertarian/constructionist (Paul), and the hawks/neo-con (Giuliani), the reformist (McCain), and the Palpatine (Cheney). The primary foreign policy debate between Paul and Giuliani is an example that many virtues are not universally agreed upon.
 
  • #10
You're taking the class and you aren't familiar with the definition of a critical term?

Thats why I'm taking the class, to learn. And republican virtue has nothing to do with political parties, it has to do with the type of government aka a republic, and how people should act within that republic to ensure it maintains a government for the people, by the people.

He actually never mentioned this term in class, what the teacher did mention was political virtue. Hence the confusion.
 
  • #11
Political virtue is an oxymoron. However, "liberty, self-determination, independence, freedom of religion and speech" - I would add the common defence and the larger population providing a safety net for those less able to produce, the same reason clans/villages started to safeguard the elderly and young from external forces. It also applies as democractic virtues too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top