Is REQ a maximal left ideal with invertible matrix Q?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xixi
  • Start date Start date
xixi
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Let R = Mn(F) be the ring consists of all n*n matrices over a field F and
E = E11 + E22 + ... + En-1,n-1, where Eii is the elementary matrix (Eij is matrix whose ij th element is 1 and the others are 0) .
I know that RE is a maximal left ideal . Let Q be an invertible matrix . Can we say that REQ is a maximal left ideal ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E is the identity element so RE=R. MQ^{-1}Q=M, so REQ is also R, which wouldn't normally be called a maximal ideal because the definition of maximal ideal requires a proper ideal.
 
Martin Rattigan said:
E is the identity element so RE=R. MQ^{-1}Q=M, so REQ is also R, which wouldn't normally be called a maximal ideal because the definition of maximal ideal requires a proper ideal.

Notice that E is not the identity element because its nth row and nth column are zero .
 
Sorry - totally missed that. I though there was something awry.
 
If R is any associative ring with 1 and q\in R has a multiplicative inverse, then \phi_q:R\rightarrow R defined by \phi_q:r\mapsto q^{-1}rq is a ring automorphism (with inverse \phi_{q^{-1}}).

If L\subset R is a maximal left ideal, then so is q^{-1}Lq. But then Lq=qq^{-1}Lq\subset q^{-1}Lq. Because L is a left ideal we have also q^{-1}Lq\subset Lq.

Hence Lq=q^{-1}Lq and therefore Lq is a maximal left ideal.

Using your assertion that RE in your question is a maximal left ideal and that Q is invertible, replacing L by RE and q by Q in the above gives the desired result.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top