Is Ruby Still Relevant in the World of Programming?

  • Thread starter Thread starter G037H3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ruby
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the experiences and preferences of Ruby developers, highlighting a love for the Ruby language and Ruby on Rails (RoR). Participants express a mix of nostalgia and current usage, with some noting a shift in focus towards Python. While Ruby's syntax is appreciated for its flexibility and expressiveness (TMTOWTDI), concerns are raised about Python's more mature implementation, particularly with features like generators in Python 3.0, which are seen as advantageous compared to Ruby's reliance on lists. Additionally, the lack of a robust visual debugger for Ruby, such as WinPDB for Python, is mentioned as a drawback. Overall, the conversation reflects a balance between fondness for Ruby and recognition of Python's strengths in practical programming scenarios.
G037H3
Messages
280
Reaction score
2
Any other Ruby developers? :)

Pure Ruby or RoR, I don't care. Anyone else love this language? :D
 
Technology news on Phys.org


I finally get around to learning Python and you go and swap focus. Not impressed.
 


JaredJames said:
I finally get around to learning Python and you go and swap focus. Not impressed.

Haha! It's too inflexible for me. I really prefer TMTOWTDI. I'm too right-brained I guess :wink:
 


G037H3 said:
Pure Ruby or RoR, I don't care. Anyone else love this language? :D
I do! I actually learned to program in it before learning Python...

Having said that, I actually do more Python programming than Ruby although I still do a fair bit of Ruby programming. The problem is that while I prefer the Ruby syntax, Python still has a more mature implementation. For example, Python 3.0 has done away with lists as default containers and have moved onto generators. After all, you rarely actually need the list and, in the rare times that you do, you can make one out of your generator! Ruby is still using lists, for now...

Also, and this is the real kicker for me, there exists a good visual debugger for Python called WinPDB. Sadly, there's nothing like it for Ruby...
 


It was amongst the first programming languages I've learned. I still use it for occasional tinkering but it's far too slow for me to love, that and I very much dislike duck-typed programming.
 
Dear Peeps I have posted a few questions about programing on this sectio of the PF forum. I want to ask you veterans how you folks learn program in assembly and about computer architecture for the x86 family. In addition to finish learning C, I am also reading the book From bits to Gates to C and Beyond. In the book, it uses the mini LC3 assembly language. I also have books on assembly programming and computer architecture. The few famous ones i have are Computer Organization and...
What percentage of programmers have learned to touch type? Have you? Do you think it's important, not just for programming, but for more-than-casual computer users generally? ChatGPT didn't have much on it ("Research indicates that less than 20% of people can touch type fluently, with many relying on the hunt-and-peck method for typing ."). 'Hunt-and-peck method' made me smile. It added, "For programmers, touch typing is a valuable skill that can enhance speed, accuracy, and focus. While...
I had a Microsoft Technical interview this past Friday, the question I was asked was this : How do you find the middle value for a dataset that is too big to fit in RAM? I was not able to figure this out during the interview, but I have been look in this all weekend and I read something online that said it can be done at O(N) using something called the counting sort histogram algorithm ( I did not learn that in my advanced data structures and algorithms class). I have watched some youtube...
Back
Top