Is Signals & Systems Memoryless/Linear?

AI Thread Summary
The first system, defined by y(t) = dx(t)/dt, is not memoryless because it relies on past values of x(t) to compute the derivative. The second system, characterized by y(t) = 0 if x(t) < 0 and y(t) = x(t) + x(t-2) if x(t) ≥ 0, is homogeneous but fails the superposition test, indicating it is not linear. When testing linearity, the presence of the unit step function complicates the output when inputs are combined, leading to potential discrepancies in expected outputs. The discussion highlights that the system behaves linearly only under specific conditions regarding the inputs. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the second system is not linear due to the failure of superposition.
sahil_time
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
1) y(t)=dx(t)/dt
Is this system memoryless?


2) y(t) = 0 if x(t)<0
x(t) + x(t-2) if x(t)>=0

Is this system linear?


Thankyou :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
1) The system is not memoryless. The definition of the derivative can be expressed in two ways. What it was before, and what it will be in the future, like the following:

\frac{dx}{dt}=\lim{Δt\rightarrow0}\frac{x(t)-x(t-Δt)}{Δt}

or

\frac{dx}{dt}=\lim{Δt\rightarrow0}\frac{x(t+Δt)-x(t)}{Δt}

The two definitions will give the same result. However, the first one is has memory (in that it uses a past value of x(t)) and the second one is non-causal (in that it uses a future value of x(t)).

If you had a system that needed to compute the derivative, the first definition is the only one you would be able to use, and that would give you a system with memory.

2) If the system is linear it must satisfy superposition and homogeneity.

Homogeneity: It's easy to see that the system is homogeneous. If an input x(t) gives y1(t) = x(t)+x(t-2) then the input αx(t) will give y2(t) = αx(t)+αx(t-2) = α(x(t)+x(t-2)) = αy1(t).

This a scaled input will produce a scaled output.

What about superposition? Well here we run into problems. Because if x1(t) < 0 and x2(t) < 0 for all t, but x1(t) + x2(t) > 0 for all t, then the response for each of the inputs will be 0, but if you add them together, they will provide an output.

Thus, the system is not linear.
 
Runei you are right about the first one. But the answer to the second one is that the system is Linear. This is how i tried to evaluate but unfortunately could not prove Linearity.

For the second question y(t)= [x(t)+x(t-2)]u[x(t)] which condenses the signal in one equation. Now we give two inputs to test superposition,

x1(t)→ y1(t)= [x1(t)+ x1(t-2)]u[x1(t)]
x2(t)→ y2(t)= [x2(t)+ x2(t-2)]u[x2(t)]

Now let x3(t) = ax1(t) + bx2(t) To test homogeniety

therefore y3(t) = [x3(t)+x3(t-2)]u[x3(t)]
= [ax1(t) + bx2(t) + ax1(t-2) + bx2(t-2)]u[ax1(t) + bx2(t)]

We have to prove that y3(t) = ay1(t) + by2(t).

I got stuck here!

Thankyou :)
 
y(t) = [x(t) + x(t-2)] u(x(t))

x1(t) → y1(t)
x2(t) → y2(t)

x3(t) = αx1(t) + βx2(t)

y3(t) = [x3(t) + x3(t-2)] u(x3(t))

= [αx1(t) + βx2(t) + αx1(t-2) + βx2(t-2)] u(x3(t))

= [αx1(t) + αx1(t-2) + βx2(t) + βx2(t-2)] u(x3(t))

= [α(x1(t) + x1(t-2)) + β(x2(t-2) + x2(t))] u(x3(t))

If we need it to be y3(t) = αy1(t) + βy2(t) we would need to somehow decompose u(x3(t)). But there is no way we can do this.

If
x1(t) ≥ 0, for all t AND
x2(t) ≥ 0, for all t

Then we can remove the unit step function. And the thing behaves like a linear system.

If
x1(t) + x2(t) ≤ 0, for all t
Then the system also behaves linearly (though the output will always be zero).

However, if

The two equations above are not satisfied, that means that for SOME t, we might have the following.

x1(t0) < 0
x2(t0) < 0
x1(t0) + x2(t0) ≥ 0

If this happens then

y1(t0) = 0;
y2(t0) = 0;

However

y3(t0) = [x3(t0) + x3(t0-2)] u(x3(t0))

= x3(t0) + x3(t0-2)

= α (x1(t0) + x1(t0-2)) + β (x2(t0) + x2(t0-2))

This equation may or may not give us 0. But we can't be sure. Thus the combined signal x1+x2 does not necesarrily provide the combined output from each of them.
 
Your solution is elegant. I think the answer in the solution manual is wrong.
Thankyou :)
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top