Is Sonoluminescence Capable of Initiating Nuclear Fusion?

AI Thread Summary
Sonoluminescence refers to the phenomenon where small bubbles emit light when subjected to sound waves, with the emitted light pulses being extremely brief. The temperature inside these bubbles is theorized to be high enough to potentially facilitate nuclear fusion, although no successful experiments have confirmed this. Professor Rusi Taleyarkhan claimed to have achieved nuclear fusion through sonoluminescence by detecting neutrons, but his findings have been challenged due to the possibility of misattributing neutron detection to his original neutron source. Critics argue that his methodology lacked rigor, particularly in using a neutron source to create the bubbles. Overall, the concept of sonoluminescence initiating nuclear fusion remains largely unproven.
lawrenca
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
can anyone explain what sonoluminescence is
I am reading this article and i don't understand what there talking about
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wow, I just stumbled onto that topic myself yesterday. Pretty crazy stuff that science.

Sonoluminescence is the term used for light emitted by a small bubble at the anti-node of a wave. The light pulses are extremely short, as is the wavelength of light emitted. It is believed that the temperature within these bubbles is great enough to be harnessed into nuclear fusion, although to my knowledge this hasn't been accomplished to date (in either individual or repeated trials)
 
Professor Rusi Taleyarkhan said that he had gotten nuclear fusion to take place, because he had detected neutrons being emitted, supposedly, from his sonoluminescence setup.

One thing that is usually used to disprove nuclear fusion claims is a lack of neutrons being produced by the reaction. Professor Taleyarkhan had used a neutron source, though to create the bubbles in the first place. It turns out that the flashes of light are on the order of a picosecond (one trillionth of a second)...he was measuring the reflected/scattered neutrons from his own source with an accuracy of a microsecond. Which is such a long span of time that it allowed the neutrons from his own source to be reflected back, and be counted as having come from the reaction, when they had not.

It has essentially been dissproven so far that he actually had nuclear fusion. I would have liked to see him run the same setup with a laser...or something else to make the bubbles. I don't know why he had to use a neutron source when he was trying to detect neutrons.

Here is one experiment that disproves it:
http://www-phys.llnl.gov/N_Div/sonolum/sonolum_paper.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top