Is Spearman's Rank Coefficient Applicable to Multiple Sets of Results?

AI Thread Summary
Spearman's rank coefficient is primarily designed to measure the correlation between two sets of results, making it unsuitable for directly analyzing multiple sets simultaneously. To assess correlations among four sets of results, one approach is to calculate the Spearman's rank coefficient for each pair of sets individually. This method allows for a comprehensive understanding of relationships across all sets. Alternatively, other statistical methods, such as multivariate analysis, could be considered for a more holistic view of the data. Understanding the limitations of Spearman's rank coefficient is crucial for accurate data interpretation in biological experiments.
garytse86
Messages
311
Reaction score
0
I have got a bit of problem here. I have got 4 sets of results for a biology experiment, and I want to find the correlation between them. So I read about Spearman's rank coefficient but it only works for two sets of results. Can somebody help please?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top